New Insights into the Dissolution of Iron Sulfide Using Chelating Agents

Author:

Ramanathan Raja Subramanian1,Nasr-El-Din Hisham A.1,Zakaria Ahmed S.2

Affiliation:

1. Texas A&M University

2. Baker Hughes, a GE Company

Abstract

Summary Iron sulfide (FeS) scales create well deliverability and integrity problems such as decreased production rates and damage to well tubulars. The application of chelating agents for production enhancement has been successful because of its high-temperature stability and its clean characteristic nature without the need for expensive additives. However, chelating agents have not been studied adequately for FeS dissolution. This paper investigates ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), diethylenetriaminepentaacteic acid (DTPA), and N-(2-hydroxyethyl) ethylenediamine-N,N′,N′-triacetic acid (HEDTA) for their FeS dissolution capacities and kinetics at 150°F and 300°F. Chelating agents are expensive chemicals and must be investigated carefully to determine the optimum concentration, pH, treatment time, and dissolver/scale ratio. FeS (0.1 g) composed of mainly troilite was used as the scale. EDTA, DTPA, and HEDTA solutions (10 cm3) were prepared at different concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 0.4 mol/L using deionized water with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ-cm. The pH of the dissolvers was dependent on the concentration and the degree of neutralization. The ligands were deprotonated at higher pH using sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide. A comparative study of the chelating agents with a low pH (3 to 5), moderate pH (5 to 9), and high pH (10 to 14) determined the optimum pH for the scale treatment. The sampling time of the dissolution process set at 1, 2, 4, 8, 20, 30, and 72 hours determined the kinetics of the scale-dissolution process and helped optimize the treatment time. A dissolver/scale ratio of 100:1, 50:1, and 20:1 cm3/g were tested. The iron concentration in the dissolver was quantified using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). Two calculated parameters, dissolution capacity and dissolver consumption, determined the effectiveness of the chelating agent in dissolving FeS sulfide. From the bottle tests at 150°F, lower pH solutions were more effective. One hundred percent of the iron from FeS was complexed by 0.3 mol/L dipotassium DTPA (K2-DTPA) after 20 hours of soaking; 0.2 mol/L disodium EDTA (Na2-EDTA) and 0.3 mol/L potassium HEDTA (K-HEDTA) were able to remove, respectively, 69 and 96% of the initial iron present in 0.1 g FeS. The mechanism of dissolution at pH < 5 was determined to be hydrogen ion (H+) attack with surface complexation. At alkaline conditions (pH > 10), the dissolution of the scale was negligible and was a result of solution complexation after FeS dissociation. The order of the chelating agents in terms of dissolution capacity was DTPA > HEDTA > EDTA at all pH conditions. The kinetics study showed that the optimum treatment depended on the pH of the chelating agent. For pH < 5 dissolvers, 16 to 20 hours was sufficient to obtain the maximum dissolution capacity. For dissolvers with a pH greater than 10, the dissolution continued for more than 72 hours and was minimal. Increasing the concentration of the chelating agent aided the solubility of the scale only at pH < 5. At 300°F and pH > 5, there was an improvement in the effectiveness of the ligands because of the increase in the system energy and increased activity of the chelating agent. A scanning electron microscopy (SEM) study showed the changes in the morphology of the FeS particles after dissolution with low- and high-pH solutions of the chelating agent. The role of chelating agents in FeS dissolution has not been thoroughly investigated. No study reports the optimum treatment time and dissolver/scale ratio. The role of the pH of the dissolver also needs more attention. This paper fills these gaps in the literature and provides the optimum dissolver composition and treatment time for field operations.

Publisher

Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)

Subject

Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Perspective Chapter: Downhole Corrosion in the Oilfield;Corrosion Engineering - Recent Breakthroughs and Innovative Solutions;2024-04-18

2. Chelating Agents in the Oilfield;Recent Advances in Coordination Chemistry [Working Title];2024-02-02

3. Unblocking Process of Complex Sulfur–Iron Scale Blockage in Sulfur-Bearing Gas Wells and Its Mechanism;ACS Omega;2023-10-20

4. Carbonate and Sulfide Mixed Scale: Corrosion, Prediction and Control;Day 1 Wed, June 28, 2023;2023-06-21

5. AVS-SEM Models;Ecological Quality Status of Marine Environment;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3