Affiliation:
1. Echometer Company
2. The University of Texas at Austin
Abstract
Summary
Three pump-intake-pressure (PIP) calculation methods available for wells artificially lifted with sucker rods are discussed in detail in this paper. The values of PIP obtained from acoustic fluid-level measurements in wells with moderate pump submergence can yield PIP estimates that agree with those of pump fluid-load analysis. If PIPs determined using these methods do not agree, then the operator must review the data quality and may reduce the deviation by adjusting certain parameters affecting the calculations. Field data for a significant group of wells are used to compare the PIP results of the three methods. The results show that the PIP computed using the maximum and minimum pump dynamometer loads usually calculates a PIP that is too low, while the PIPs computed using the valve test loads are usually too high. Recommendations are presented for quality control of the computed values.
Publisher
Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Fuel Technology,General Chemical Engineering
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Untethered Pressure Sensor Conveyance for Bottomhole Pressure Measurement;Day 1 Mon, May 06, 2024;2024-04-29
2. Clustering Intermittent Pumping: A Novel Low-Cost Intelligent Producing Method for Multiple Wells Based on Edge Computing;Day 2 Tue, February 13, 2024;2024-02-12
3. Accurate Gas-To-Pump Calculation in Pumping Oil Wells from Surface Data Using Combined Analytical Modeling of Gaseous Static Liquids Gradient: Part 1;Day 2 Wed, August 24, 2022;2022-08-19
4. Liquids Level Calculation in Loaded Gas Wells from Surface Data Using Combined Analytical Modeling of Gaseous Static Liquids Gradient: Part 2;Day 2 Wed, August 24, 2022;2022-08-19
5. Edge Optimization Analytics and Control: A Integrated Device of Intelligent Intermittent Pumping for Tight Oil Wells;Day 2 Wed, March 23, 2022;2022-03-18