Wettability Determination and Its Effect on Recovery Efficiency

Author:

Donaldson Erle C.1,Thomas Rex D.1,Lorenz Philip B.1

Affiliation:

1. U.S. Bureau of Mines

Abstract

Abstract A quantitative method for measuring the wettability of porous media containing brine and crude oil has been developed by the USBM using capillary pressure curves determined with a centrifuge. These measurements were reproducible within a standard deviation of 8.2 percent. The determination of fractional wettability has been compared with a method involving a combination of imbibition and displacement. Results are in agreement qualitatively as to whether a sample was water-wet or oil-wet. When tested with outcrop cores of Torpedo Sandstone, wetting tendencies of oils from widely different fields range from highly water-wet to almost neutral. Silicone-treated cores vary in extent of wettability in a predictable manner, becoming more oil-wet as the concentration of silicone used in core preparation is increased. Wettability, used as a parameter in designing linear mathematical models for predicting recovery efficiency, is equal in significance to viscosity and permeability. permeability Introduction Wettability is one of the major factors that influences oil recovery. The importance of maintaining a water-wet condition in a field under water drive has been discussed by many authors. These authors have shown that oil recovery, as a function of the water injected, is greater from water-wet cores than from oil-wet cores. A few authors have indicated that recovery from strongly water-wet or oil-wet cores is less than recovery from cores that are at some intermediate wettability. One reason that the significance of wettability to oil recovery is still being evaluated is because a quantitative measurement of wettability has not been available when crude oil is involved. Some qualitative methods for determining the wettability of cores that are discussed in the literature includeuse of relative permeability data,imbibition,displacement pressure,capillary pressure, anda combination of imbibition and displacement. Using these methods, cores can be classified as either water-wet or oil-wet. However, these methods are not satisfactory for intermediate wettabilities between water-wet and oil-wet. Nuclear magnetic relaxation and dye adsorption offer promise of a quantitative method for determining wettability; however, they have not been widely accepted. This paper presents a quantitative technique for determining the wettability of sandstone cores containing brine and crude petroleum oils. The method is rapid and reproducible and requires only a minimum handling of the cores before testing. It also establishes a numerical wettability scale for systems ranging from strongly water-wet to strongly oil-wet. TECHNIQUE WETTABILITY TEST PROCEDURE The USBM method for determining wettability is based on a correlation, suggested by Gatenby and Marsden, between the degree of wetting and the areas under the capillary-pressure curves. The method employs the two areas under the capillary-pressure curves obtained by the centrifuge method described by Slobod et al., and extended to determine capillary pressure curves for oil and water. Gatenby and Marsden, and earlier Slobod and Blum, suggested the use of individual points on the capillary pressure curve, but the area is considered representative of the over-all wettability, as it is an integrated value over the practical range of saturations. Capillary-pressure curves obtained by the centrifugal method are not complete descriptions of the capillary pressure vs saturation relationship of a porous medium. The water imbibition curve for pressures greater than zero and the water drainage curve for pressures less than zero cannot be obtained by the centrifugal technique. SPEJ P. 13

Publisher

Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)

Subject

General Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3