Experimental and Numerical Studies of Gas/Oil Multicontact Miscible Displacements in Homogeneous Porous Media

Author:

Al-Wahaibi Y.M.1,Muggeridge A.H.1,Grattoni C.A.1

Affiliation:

1. Imperial College London

Abstract

Abstract Both vaporizing and condensing miscible gas floods are being conducted in a large number of reservoirs worldwide. The performance of these gas floods is usually determined via a combination of laboratory analysis and compositional simulation. However the ability of numerical simulation to correctly predict the progress of a multi-contact miscible displacement has not been fully verified. This paper investigatesthe physical processes occurring during multi-contact miscible displacementthe ability of the Coats correlation to model the changes in gas-oil relative permeabilities with interfacial tension (IFT) and the associated inaccuracies in predicted oil recoverythe importance of gas/oil disequilibrium on the prediction of oil recovery and gas-oil ratio These objectives are achieved by using a commercial compositional simulator to predict the behaviour of multicontact miscible (MCM) floods in well-characterised, beadpack experiments. Both condensing and vaporizing drives are investigated using a ternary liquid system that exhibits an upper critical point at ambient conditions. Relative permeabilities as a function of IFT were obtained independently from displacement experiments. Glass beadpacks permitted the visualisation of the displacements whilst the effluent profiles in terms of composition and phase volume versus time were measured using a calibration with refractive index of the fluids. Condensing and vaporizing gas-drive displacements were very efficient with about 90% of the oil in place recovered at one pore volume injected. Compared to immiscible displacements, breakthrough and total recoveries were increased by 8% and 20% respectively. However, in both condensing and vaporising drives, the compositional simulation (that assumes equilibrium conditions) over-predicted oil recovery. Further simulations identified that these errors are due to inaccuracies in Coats' correlation describing the behaviour of relative permeabilities as miscibility is approached and/or the fact that the produced fluids were not in compositional equilibrium. Introduction Miscible gas injection is being performed in a large number of reservoirs worldwide with the aim of improving oil recovery1. In most cases the injected gas is not initially miscible with the oil: miscibility is achieved by the net transfer of components from the oil into the gas (a vaporizing gas drive) or from the gas to the oil (a condensing gas drive). Compositional numerical simulation is usually used to predict the performance of these recovery schemes on the basis of equation of state properties determined from regression on data obtained from laboratory experiments. The accuracy of these predictions is critically dependent upon the validity of the assumptions used in these simulations. The most critical of these assumptions is that of instantaneous local thermodynamic equilibrium in each grid block. However, whilst the ability of numerical simulation to predict first contact miscible and immiscible displacements has been evaluated by comparison with experiment in a number of studies2–7, there are very few studies investigating the compositional simulation of multi-contact miscible experiments8–11. Moreover there are virtually no studies which use the simulator to predict both phase and flow behaviour directly from the experimental properties. Most studies resort to some degree of history matching either to model the phase behaviour of multi-component hydrocarbons through the use of pseudo-components8–11 or to model the influence of unknown heterogeneities in the cores or rock slabs8–11.

Publisher

SPE

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An improved method to study CO2–oil relative permeability under miscible conditions;Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology;2014-06-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3