Affiliation:
1. The University of Texas at Austin
2. Cornell University
Abstract
AbstractWith recurrent calls for a reduction in carbon emissions, geothermal energy has received increasing attention in recent years as a prominent source of clean energy. With current drilling technology, geothermal wells are being constructed in extremely challenging temperature environments, which could reach up to 600°F/315°C in-situ temperature and beyond. However, geothermal well-cementing technology has not changed much over the past few decades, with Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) still being the primary choice of cementing material. OPC has several drawbacks such as brittle behavior, shrinkage upon setting, poor bond strength to formation and casing, susceptibility to acid gas attack, temperature-induced strength retrogression, low tolerance towards drilling fluid contamination, etc. These factors could lead to a poor cementing job, thus compromising well integrity and not ensuring proper zonal isolation for the life of the geothermal well. Thus, there is a need to develop an alternative material that is compatible with the geothermal environment and able to provide long-term zonal isolation. With a low carbon footprint, self-healing ability, and low shrinkage sensitivity, geopolymers or alkali-activated materials could be a suitable option to augment or even replace OPC. Some of the previous studies on geopolymers have shown that they could be a potential candidate for oil and gas well cementing and civil engineering applications, with some being stable at very high temperatures (up to 1470°F/800°C). Geopolymers are formed by mixing an aluminosilicate source such as fly ash with an alkali-activating solution, such as sodium or potassium hydroxide or silicate.The aim of the study reported here is to demonstrate the applicability of geopolymers for geothermal well cementing. An experimental investigation was carried out to understand the behavior of geopolymer formulations made from fly ash, metakaolin, and blast furnace slag in a high-temperature environment. The material properties such as porosity, viscosity, thickening/pump time, compressive strength, tensile strength, and bond strength were tested in the laboratory. It was found that geopolymer formulations can be formulated to have the desired rheological properties with adequate pump time and resistance to drilling fluid contamination. In addition, the formulations can exceed the required compressive and tensile strength for geothermal cementing operations, while obtaining excellent bond strength values. These findings indicate that geopolymers are cementing materials that are well-suited to provide long-term zonal isolation in high-temperature geothermal wells.
Reference39 articles.
1. Specifications for Cements and Materials for Well Cementing;API RP 10A,2019
2. Recommended Practices for Testing Well Cements;API RP 10B-2,2010
3. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens;ASTM C39/C39M,2021
4. Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens;ASTM C496/C496M,2017
5. A Review on Geothermal Wells: Well Integrity Issues;Allahvirdizadeh;Journal of Cleaner Production,2020
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献