Best Practice of Using Empirical Methods for Production Forecast and EUR Estimation in Tight/Shale Gas Reservoirs

Author:

Yu Shaoyong1

Affiliation:

1. ConocoPhillips Canada

Abstract

Abstract Since 2008, a number of new empirical methods have been introduced to the petroleum industry, specifically for gas wells in tight and shale reservoirs. Among them, Valko’s Stretch Exponential Production Decline (SEPD) and Duong’s Rate Decline for Fractured Dominated Reservoir are two most mentioned methods by industry experts. These two methods are claimed to be accurate in both tight and shale gas wells. However, since the reservoir rock permeability in those reservoirs ranges from 0.1 to 0.0001 mD in tight gas to less than 0.0001 mD in shale gas, are these two empirical methods still applicable in all ranges of permeability? This paper presents the results of an evaluation study by applying these two empirical methods to tight and shale gas wells under a wide range of permeability generated based on both actual and synthetic production data. The key findings and recommended improvements resulted from the study are: Both SEPD and Duong’s Rate-Decline Methods are not applicable to tight gas reservoirs with a permeability ranging from 0.1 to 0.001mD. Duong’s Rate Decline Method will significantly over-estimate EUR whereas SEPD will most likely mismatch the production history as well as yielding a lower EUR while using its Recovery Potential Curve to find parameters.A Modified SEPD Method (YM-SEPD) developed by the author is a much easier and versatile method to use, and most importantly it will yield a more reliable production forecast and EUR estimation.With respect to reservoirs with rock permeability less than 0.01mD, a more rigorous step-by-step work flow using Duong’s Method has been proposed. Moreover, for tight gas reservoirs Duong’s Method can only be used for production forecast during early years, prior to pseudo-steady state (PSS) flow.Hundreds of horizontal wells including both oil and gas wells, from various formations (Cadomin, Montney, Notikewin, Cardium, etc. in Canada) and under different hydraulic fracturing conditions, have been analyzed using these three different methods. Results indicate that the new YM-SEPD Method will yield a more reliable EUR as well as production forecast in comparison with other two methods, especially when there is only less than 2~3 years of production history.For wells having less than 2 years of production history, the YM-SEPD Method will also be able to yield a reasonable prediction by coupling with Duong’s Decline Method

Publisher

SPE

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3