Coreflood Effluent and Shale Surface Chemistries in Predicting Interaction between Shale, Brine, and Reactive Fluid

Author:

Gundogar A. S.1,Druhan J. D.2,Ross C. M.3,Jew A. D.4,Bargar J. R.4,Kovscek A. R.5

Affiliation:

1. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and Stanford University (Corresponding author)

2. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

3. Stanford University

4. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

5. Stanford University (Corresponding author)

Abstract

Summary Field and laboratory observations to date indicate that the efficiency of hydraulic fracturing, as it relates to hydrocarbon recovery, depends significantly on geochemical alterations to rock surfaces that diminish accessibility by partial or total plugging of the pore and fracture networks. This is caused by mineral scale deposition, such as coating of fracture surfaces with precipitates, particle migration, and/or crack closure, because of dissolution under stress. In reactive flow-through experiments, mineral reactions in response to acidic fluid injection significantly reduced system porosity and core permeability. The present study focuses on changes to fluid chemistry and shale surfaces (inlet and fracture walls) resulting from shale-fluid interactions and integrates these findings for an improved estimate of transport-related consequences. The pre- and post-reaction shale surfaces were examined by spatially resolved scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) analysis. Importantly, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry/optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-MS/OES) was utilized to probe the chemical evolution of the coreflood effluents. The three study cores selected from the Marcellus formation represent different mineralogies and structural features. In flow-through experiments, laboratory-generated brine and HCl-based fracture fluid (pH = 2) were injected sequentially under effective stress (up to 500 psi) at reservoir temperature (80°C). SEM-EDS results confirmed by the ICP concentration trends showed significant Fe hydroxide precipitates in the clay- and pyrite-rich outcrop sample because of partial oxidation of Fe-bearing phases in the case of intrusion of low salinity water-based fluids. Porosity reduction in the Marcellus Shale Energy and Environmental Laboratory (MSEEL) carbonate-rich sample is related to compaction of cores under stress because of matrix softening with substantial dissolution, and pore filling by hydroxides, as well as secondary barite and salts. Despite the same fluid compositions and experimental conditions used for both MSEEL samples, barite precipitation was much more intense in the MSEEL clay-rich sample because of its greater sorption capacity and additional sulfate source as well as its fissile nature with multiple lengthwise cracks. ICP tests revealed time-resolved concentration behavior in produced brine and reactive fluids that in turn complemented the pre/post-reaction SEM-EDS observations. The greatest release of metal ions into brine was in clay-rich systems indicating the importance of chemical compatibility between in-situ shale and nonequilibrated injection solutions. A thorough examination of surface and effluent data pointed to the substantial influence of formation brine in the shales, mixing of brine with fracture fluid during flow, and shale mineralogy on mineral dissolution and scale formation that significantly affect flow efficiency.

Publisher

Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)

Subject

Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Reference46 articles.

1. Characterization of Marcellus Shale Flowback Water;Abualfaraj;Environ Eng Sci,2014

2. Multiscale Imaging of Gas Storage in Shales;Aljamaan;SPE J.,2017

3. A Model Describing Flowback Chemistry Changes with Time after Marcellus Shale Hydraulic Fracturing;Balashov;Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull,2015

4. Marcellus Shale Post-Frac Flowback Waters - Where Is All the Salt Coming from and What Are the Implications?;Blauch,2009

5. American Petroleum Institute (API) . 2020. How Much Water Does Hydraulic Fracturing Use?. https://www.api.org/oil-and-natural-gas/energy-primers/hydraulic-fracturing/how-much-water-does-hydraulic-fracturing-use-2.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3