Abstract
Summary
The mechanisms controlling transport and mobility of foam in porous media are complex, but in some cases the mechanisms that dominate foam properties can be represented in simple models. For instance, fractional-flow methods can reproduce the predictions of more-complex foam simulators while highlighting the mechanisms controlling foam behavior. Fractional-flow methods indicate that the effectiveness of foam processes that alternate injection of liquid and gas ("SAG" processes) depends on foam strength at extremely high foam quality, conditions difficult to control in the laboratory.
A numerical simulator that incorporates the relation between capillary pressure and foam stability extends simplified foam modeling to cases where fractional-flow methods do not apply. Applications of this simulator to one-dimensional (1D) foam displacements match predictions of analytical models based on laboratory data and illustrate the numerical artifacts that challenge foam simulation. Applications to 2D flow through layers in capillary contact show that the interplay between capillary crossflow and foam collapse depends on both the dimensions of the layers and the relative magnitudes of the capillary and viscous pressure differences.
Publisher
Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)
Subject
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Cited by
67 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献