Abstract
Abstract
Peregrino is a heavy oil field in the Campos basin offshore Brazil. The field started production in 2011, and Phase 2 was on stream in 2022. More development drilling is ongoing. The oil viscosity in Phase 2 has large variations from limited exploration wells, ranging from 30 to 180 cp. Any changes in the viscosity in the reservoirs can lead to a large difference in oil recovery. Therefore, updating the viscosity distribution in the reservoirs along with the development drilling is important.
Different methods can acquire reservoir oil viscosity, including downhole logging and sampling, mud gas, extracts from cuttings, and surface oil sampling. Our previous studies demonstrate that mud gas provides real-time and continuous reservoir oil properties. Due to the use of water-based mud in the development drilling and relatively high degasser temperature, the standard mud gas data has been of good quality come to light gas components C1 to C3. Standard mud gas logging is part of the mud logging service, and there is no additional cost to acquire the data. Can we develop a simple approach to predict the oil viscosity based on the "free" standard mud gas data?
A thorough study has been performed based on the reservoir fluid database from the Peregrino field. The results show the methane/ethane and methane/propane ratios are the best parameters correlated to reservoir oil viscosity. Before adopting the new method using standard mud gas, we extensively compared results with the measurement of PVT (Pressure Volume Temperature) samples and pressure points. The comparison shows that the simple approach based on standard mud gas provides an oil viscosity classification that distinguishes between high and low-viscosity fluids along a given well. The threshold for the two categories is identified from the reservoir fluid database, and the results from the mud gas method are in excellent agreement with the experimental results from the PVT analysis. The latter ones are regarded as the ground truth answer. Therefore, we deployed a simple approach based on standard mud gas data to map oil viscosity for future wells.
The new approach using standard mud gas data provides a real-time method to identify the continuous reservoir oil viscosity following the well path without data acquisition cost. Along with drilling more wells, we will soon achieve a detailed and accurate reservoir oil viscosity distribution in different reservoirs. The viscosity mapping of the reservoirs lays the ground for further optimizing the drilling target and well placement and improving the oil recovery.
Reference9 articles.
1. Al-Marhoun, M.A.
Evaluation of empirically derived PVT properties for Middle East crude oils. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. Volume 42, 209–221 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2003.12.012
2. Ali, S. & Thomas, S.
The promise and problems of enhanced oil recovery methods. Journal Canadian Petroleum Technology, Volume 35 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2118/96-07-07
3. Anifowose, F., Mezghani, M.
Mud Gas Data Could Reveal a Wealth of Reservoir Information. Journal of petroleum technology under Data & Analytics (2021). https://jpt.spe.org/mud-gas-data-could-reveal-a-wealth-of-reservoir-information
4. Cely, A., Skaar, I., Yang, T.
2023. Holistic evaluation of reservoir oil viscosity in Breidablikk field - including mud gas logging approach. SPWLA 64th Annual Logging Symposium. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30632/SPWLA-2023-0039
5. Cutler, I., Cely, A., Moore, J., Yang, T., 2022, viscosity from geochemical techniques: A case study for a heavy oil field on the UKCS, Paper SPE-209690-MS presented at the SPE EuropEC featured at the 83rd EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, Madrid, Spain, 6-9 June. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/209690-MS