Validation of Error Models – A Key Component of Risk Mitigation in Wellbore Collision Challenges

Author:

Ali Tarig1,Ledroz Adrián1,Weston John1,Allen William2

Affiliation:

1. Gyrodata

2. BP

Abstract

Abstract The estimation of wellbore position uncertainty, sometimes referred to as error modelling, is of vital importance when considering the safety and efficiency of the drilling process, particularly in crowded fields with tight spacing between wells. New survey tools employing new technology, new principles and sophisticated data processing techniques become available every year with different accuracy claims. The dependability of the error models and whether they properly represent the uncertainties of a given survey system, new or old, is not easy to judge. This paper describes a simple method to support the validation process of uncertainty models. Multiple surveys of different type are often available for the same well with some degree of overlap for different wellbore sections. For example, the well might have been drilled using magnetic MWD data and later a drop gyro might have been run to reduce the positional uncertainty or to validate the magnetic data. Overlapping surveys can be compared, and the difference can be gauged against the claimed uncertainty models using the relative instrument performance model (RIP) test and the Chi-square test. Analysis of several wells with different trajectories and more than 100 overlapping surveys has allowed a major oil company to build confidence and accept the uncertainty models claimed by one service company. This has allowed the oil company to implement the service company IPM (Instrument Performance Model) files without having necessarily to understand in great detail how the survey systems operate, how they are calibrated or quality controlled. Using the right models allows optimal planning of wells and survey programs, and reduces the risks of a collision while at the same time permitting wells to be drilled in congested fields. The paper describes a simple approach for validating uncertainty models for survey tools. The tests used for the validation are available in most well planning software programs and can be completed by personnel without the necessary expertise required to understand the subtleties of all the survey tools involved in the process.

Publisher

SPE

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3