Affiliation:
1. Barree & Associates
2. Stim-Lab Division of Core Laboratories
3. ProTechnics Division of Core Laboratories
Abstract
Abstract
For years, uncontrolled fracture heights have been modeled for layered reservoirs using Mode-I tensile failure driven threedimensional (3D) and pseudo-three-dimensional (P3D) fracture geometry models. In these models stress contrast between layers has been assumed to provide the dominant height containment mechanism. Meanwhile, many of the completion diagnostic tools were revealing more contained fracture heights and were thus being discounted. As more diagnostic tools have been employed, it has become apparent that the frac models may have been incorrectly over-predicting fracture heights in many cases. Mine-backs and post-frac coring revealed more contained fracture heights, as did radioactive tracer logs, treating pressure profiles, fall-off data, production modeling, and the absence of perforated interval communication.
This paper will present some of the diagnostic data that support more contained fracture height development. These will include case histories from tight gas sands and shales in which restricted fracture height observations are supported by diagnostic observations. It will also go one-step further, by proposing mechanisms which contribute to fracture height containment. These include poroelasticity, abnormally high "trapped" pore pressure, and complex shear in layered or anisotropic media. It will present some modeling methodologies that place more emphasis on poroelasticity and Mode-II shear failure than current conventional fracture models. The need for investigation, and adoption, of these methodologies will be corroborated by diagnostic data.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献