Definitive Survey Methodology – Update to an Old Concept for Higher Reliability

Author:

Naschenveng André1,Isaac Lucas2,Laroca Fernando1,Franceschi Cláudio1,Neves Alex2,Canté Fábio1,Ledroz Adrián2,Carrasquilla Abel3

Affiliation:

1. Petrobras

2. Gyrodata

3. Universidade do Estado Norte Fluminense

Abstract

Abstract Data quality assurance applied to well positioning optimizes contingency plans to reduce the time to drill a relief well and provides greater reliability in autonomous and remote drilling operations. In addition, it provides the highest degree of agreement with the well design, making it possible to reach the best productive zones of the reservoir and avoid geological risks. This data quality assurance procedure supports the construction of high-productivity wells in the offshore pre-salt fields in Brazil. The objective of this work is to present the results of the Definitive Survey Methodology in pre-salt wells, to improve the survey quality assurance and the reduction of uncertainty ellipses - during operation and in real-time - using two survey tools with different physical principles. The Definitive Survey Methodology promotes the verification of error models of the survey tools and reduces the Ellipses of Uncertainty (EOU), well to well, creating an external directional data quality assurance, which goes beyond specific internal quality controls used by service companies. The methodology consists of the use of three tests that compare independent surveys. The first and second tests are statistical, Relative Instrument Performance (RIP), and Chi-square, in which the reliability of the used error models is verified. The RIP test is a comparison that produces results with quantitative values about the agreement of overlapping surveys. The Chi-square test is a quality fit test that compares two surveys and their compliances with their error models. The third test is a qualitative geometric test that compares the uncertainty ellipses of different survey tools at the same depth, allowing a quick interpretation of graphic representations and can be applied during or after drilling. The methodology was applied in four pre-salt wells named in this paper as Well_A, Well_B, Well_C, and Well_D. The final measured depths of the wells range from 5078m to 6801m. The tools used were: gyro while drilling (GWD) for all inclinations in real-time (inrun), GWD outrun memory mode (OMM), drop gyros, and measurement while drilling (MWD). The methodology resulted in a reduction of 74.55% (Well_A), 50.93% (Well_B), 33.69% (Well_C), and 60.05% (Well_D) of the ellipse of uncertainty at the top of the reservoir. The use of the Definitive Survey Methodology enhances the quality of the directional data, verifying the error models used well to well. The reduction of uncertainties provided by the gyroscopic tool ensures the reliability of the contingency plan and the entry into the top of the reservoir. Consequently, by optimizing the positioning of the wells, it is expected to make the most of the natural resources in the long term, while also building safer contingency plans, and making the extraction activity of this natural resource more sustainable.

Publisher

SPE

Reference13 articles.

1. Bang, Jon, Ali, Tarig, and AdriánLedroz. "Practical Method to Benefit from the Improved Accuracy of Combining Overlapping Wellbore Surveys." Paper presented at the SPE Norway One Day Seminar, Bergen, Norway, May 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/195621-MS.

2. International Steering Committee on Wellbore Survey Accuracy, Well Intercept Subcommittee;Poedjono,2021

3. Quantification of depth accuracy;Brooks,2005

4. A New Wellbore Position Calculation Method;Chia;SPE Drill & Compl,2003

5. Geo-steering long horizontal holes in Abu Dhabi heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs;Dawoud,2010

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3