Error Characteristics of Extratropical-Storm Wind Fields Specified From Historical Data

Author:

Cardone V.J.1,Broccoli A.J.1,Greenwood C.V.1,Greenwood J.A.1

Affiliation:

1. Oceanweather Inc.

Abstract

This study derives errors inherent in methods used to specify marine surface wind fields in hindcast studies of extreme environmental factors associated with extratropical storms. The northeastern Pacific Ocean is taken as the study basin, but results should apply to most Northern Hemisphere areas. Introduction As part of the selection process for environmental design data for offshore structures to be placed in regions exposed to severe storms, data on extreme waves, currents, and surge are generated, usually by the application of hydrodynamic models in historical hindcast studies. The need to describe accurately the temporal and spatial distribution of the surface over the sea arises both in calibrating the hydrodynamic models and in applying the models to long meteorological series to provide a data base of environmental extremes for statistical evaluation. Specification of the most accurate wind field description possible is especially crucial in the calibration studies. There, it is important to isolate errors in predictions of environmental factors (waves, currents, and surge) that are related to model physics or numerics from those errors introduced by deficiencies in the wind field. Of course, accurate windfield specification is desired in long-term historical simulations, though the sparsity pf early history meteorological data places an upper bound on attainable accuracy. In lieu of high accuracy, it becomes important to determine the errors that characterize historical wind field descriptions and the impact of those errors on the accuracy and reliability of environmental series generated by hindcast models. While much work has been reported recently on development, calibration, and application of hindcast models, the specification and validation of wind fields has received little attention, at least for extratropical storms. This study was designed specifically to determine the errors characteristic of alternative methods that have been used to specify marine surface wind fields in hindcast studies of extreme environmental factors associated with extratropical storms. The northeastern Pacific Ocean was taken as the test basin, but the results should apply to any extratropical region with a comparable meteorological data density (e.g., north Atlantic, North Sea, Bering Sea).

Publisher

Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)

Subject

Strategy and Management,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Industrial relations,Fuel Technology

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3