Effects of Crosslinker Type and Additives on the Performance on In-Situ Gelled Acids

Author:

Ahmed Wael A. Fattah1,Nasr-El-Din Hisham A.2,Moawad Taha Moustafa3,Elgibaly A.A.M.4

Affiliation:

1. SAPESCO

2. Saudi Aramco

3. Faculty of Petroleum and Minin

4. Kuwait University

Abstract

Abstract One of the most important factors that determine the outcome of matrix acidizing treatment is acid placement across the target zone. Chemical and mechanical means are used to enhance diversion during matrix acid treatment in various well completions; extended reach and multi-lateral wells. In-situ gelled acid that is based on polyacrylamide-based polymers has been used in the industry for several years.1,2 Previous studies highlighted that this acid can be used for diversion in formations with almost no hydrogen sulfide and permeability greater than 50 md.3 This acid consists of a polyacrylamide-based polymer, a cross linker, a buffer and a breaker. The cross-linker reacts with the polymer at a certain pH value and forms a gel, which helps in diverting the acid in tight or damaged zones. A breaker is used to reverse the gelation reaction at pH values that depend on the system. There are various cross-linkers available including those that are based on iron, aluminum and zirconium. The objective of this study is to examine the effect of type of cross linker and acid additives on the performance of in-situ gelled acids. Coreflood tests and rheological studies were conducted in this work. The results obtained indicated that the gelation pH depends on the type of cross-linker used. Aluminum formed a gel at much higher pH values ((pH 4.3) compared the gel formed with iron (pH 2.6). Corrosion inhibitor reduced the pH of gelation in the case of iron, whereas an opposite effect was noted with the Al-based acid. Mutual solvent (ethylene glycol monobutylether) was very effective in reducing gel residue at pH values greater than 5. Core tests indicated the in-situ gelled acid increased the permeability of tight cores from 35 to 2,000 md. Unlike previous studies, which showed damaged due to this system, no polymer residue was noted after flushing the core with mutual solvent solutions. Introduction Various chemical treatments are used to remove formation damage and enhance well performance. These chemicals include acids, oxidizers, enzymes, chelating agents and combinatations of these chemicals. Improper design of these treatment can include new and more difficult type of formation damage.4 In matrix acidizing treatments, in-situ gelled acids have been used for diversion.1,2 Diversion in acidizing extended reach wells in heterogeneous carbonate formations is one of the most important factors that determines the outcome of the treatment. In-situ gelled acid consists of a polyacrylamide-based polymer, a cross linker, a buffer and a breaker. The cross-linker reacts with the polymer at a certain pH value and forms a gel, which helps in diverting the acid into tight or damaged zones. A breaker is used to reverse the gelation reaction at pH values that depend on the system. There are various cross-linkers available including those that are based on iron, aluminum and zirconium. Several studies examined in-situ gelled acids both in the lab and in the field. Yeager and Shuchart 1 showed that in-situ gelled acids that are based on iron can form a gel at a pH value of nearly 2. Taylor et al.2 investigated three different acid systems and found that some of these acids did not form a gel. And a result, proper and extensive testing of these acids is recommended. Lynn and Nasr-El-Din5 examined in-situ gelled acids for high temperature application. They notes polymer residue attached to the walls of the wormholes created by the acid. Also the cross-linker, iron, precipitated in the core. Precipitation of iron and polymer residue can reduce the outcome of acid treatments. Nasr-El-Din et al.3 examined propagation of in-situ gelled acids in carbonate cores. They note polymer residue on the injection side of the cores. Obviously, using this polymer in the field will require flowing back the treated well. This flow back is needed to remove polymer residue. They also highlighted various negative interactions of this system in the presence of hydrogen sulfide, even in the presence of hydrogen sulfide scavengers.

Publisher

SPE

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3