Determining Anisotropic Formation Resistivity at Any Relative Dip Using a Multiarray Triaxial Induction Tool

Author:

Wang Hanming1,Barber Tom1,Morriss Chris1,Rosthal Richard Alan1,Hayden Ron S.1,Markley Marvin E.

Affiliation:

1. Schlumberger

Abstract

Abstract Thin-bedded sand-shale sequences frequently exhibit resistivity anisotropy. That is, resistivity measured perpendicular to the bedding (Rv) is significantly higher than the resistivity measured parallel to the bedding (Rh). It is difficult to determine water saturation in these sequences using standard induction logs that respond primarily to Rh, regardless of relative dip angle. If conductive shale laminations are present, the water saturation is over estimated; equivalently, hydrocarbon in place is underestimated. A recently introduced triaxial induction tool provides several 3x3 tensor measurements that are sensitive to Rh, Rv and formation dip. A fast and rigorous inversion of triaxial induction data provides logs of Rh and Rv without shoulder bed effect, and also provides logs of formation dip. The robustness of the inversion algorithm has been validated with synthetic log data. A petrophysical model has been developed that computes both sand resistivity (Rsand) and shale resistivity (Rshale) from Rh and Rv logs. Fraction of shale, determined using established log interpretation techniques, is an input to the model. Since the induction measurement is relatively deep, the uncertainty in water saturation using the model is greatly reduced compared to interpretation models that use microresistivity logs. Case studies from oilfields around the world demonstrate the utility of triaxial induction measurements for formation evaluation. Data were acquired in a wide variety of borehole and formation environments. These include oil-based mud, water-base mud, dipping formations, vertical wells, deviated wells, and a wide-range of borehole sizes. Low resistivity pay zones were identified that might otherwise be missed with standard induction logs. Microresistivity images confirmed the presence of thin laminations and confirmed the dip measurements from the triaxial induction. Introduction H.G. Doll introduced the standard induction tool in 1949.1 An alternating current of constant intensity is sent through a transmitter coil with its magnetic moment along the axis of the tool (axial coil). The alternating magnetic field induces currents in the formation surrounding the borehole. These currents flow in a formation ring that behaves like a transmitter coil and generates its own secondary magnetic field, which induces an electric signal measured as a voltage in the axial receiver coil. This voltage is proportional to the rock conductivity and is normalized in terms of apparent conductivity. With the axial coil arrangement in standard induction tools (dual induction tools and array induction tools), the induced formation currents are orthogonal to the tool (and borehole) axis. The limitations of standard induction measurements can be expressed in several ways:When the thicknesses of individual beds are less than the vertical resolution of the induction (e.g., several feet), the formation can be considered as an equivalent anisotropic formation.Standard induction logs are dominated by conductive layers and are relatively insensitive to resistive layers that may be associated with hydrocarbon bearing sands. This occurs at all relative dip angles but is especially pronounced at zero relative dip. For the case of zero relative dip, induced currents do not cross bed boundaries and the measured conductivity is essentially a measurement of conductivity parallel to formation bedding. The measurement is insensitive to conductivity perpendicular to formation bedding.When the thicknesses of individual beds are comparable to the vertical resolution of the induction, the tool response is affected by conductive shoulder beds. The shoulder bed effect is especially pronounced at high relative dip angle. Dip and shoulder bed effect can be corrected using advanced post-processing algorithms (e.g., maximum-entropy processing2,3). This type of processing requires an external measurement of dip from, for example, a borehole imaging tool.

Publisher

SPE

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3