Decision-Making in the Oil and Gas Industry--From Blissful Ignorance to Uncertainty-Induced Confusion

Author:

Bickel J. Eric1,Bratvold Reidar Brumer2

Affiliation:

1. Texas A&M University

2. U. of Stavanger

Abstract

Abstract The battle against deterministic forecasts and financial valuations in the oil and gas industry appears to have been won, as evidenced by the plethora of papers, conference sessions, and forums focused on uncertainty quantification or profit prediction. Yet, decision makers are still not sure what they should do. Rather than basing important decisions on a single number, they now find themselves buried under a mountain of probability distributions. Uncertainty quantification seems to have confused more than it has enlightened. In this paper, we present the findings of a survey of oil and gas professionals that addressed the following two questions: To what degree has uncertainty quantification improved in the oil and gas industry over the last five years? Has this improvement translated into improved decision making? Uncertainty quantification is not an end unto itself; removing or even reducing uncertainty is not the goal. Rather, the objective is to make a good decision, which in many cases requires the assessment of the relevant uncertainties. The oil and gas industry seems to have lost sight of this goal in its good-faith effort to provide decision makers with a richer understanding of the possible outcomes flowing from major decisions. The industry implicitly believes that uncertainty is reduced simply by modeling it and that making good decisions merely requires more information. To counter this, we present a decision-focused uncertainty quantification framework, which we hope, in combination with our survey results, will aid in the innovation of better decision-making tools and methodologies. Introduction The use of probabilistic modeling in the oil and gas industry has increased significantly over the last 10 years, as evidenced by the large number of publications and SPE workshops and forums dedicated to the topic. For example, TABLE 1 lists every SPE forum since 1979 that has dealt with uncertainty, prediction, or decision making.* This information is interesting in two respects. First, six out of the eight forums have taken place in the last 10 years. Second, only one forum includes the word "decision" in the title, suggesting a strong focus by the SPE community on uncertainty quantification rather than decision making.

Publisher

SPE

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3