Affiliation:
1. Texas A&M University
2. ExxonMobil Upstream Integrated Solutions Company
3. Pason Systems
4. Apache Corporation
5. National Oilwell Varco
6. Contractor
7. K&M Technology Group
8. Occidental
9. Corva
10. Marathon Oil Ret
11. Marathon Oil
12. Pioneer Natural Resources
13. Ensign Energy
Abstract
AbstractThis paper recommends standardized names and equations for the two most common uses of Mechanical Specific Energy (MSE) concepts: "Total MSE" and "Downhole MSE". These names and their equations should be used uniformly in all applications, including electronic drilling recorder (EDR) pick lists, rig site surveillance, engineering surveillance, data analytics, research, and technical publications.Mechanical Specific Energy, used as a metric for drilling efficiency, is a mathematical calculation of the energy used per volume of rock drilled. The Downhole MSE equation calculates the efficiency of the bit alone, while the Total MSE equation includes both the bit and drill string. Those who use MSE in surveillance or analytics know the negative effects created by the lack of standardization over the years; it is certainly not a new problem.The lack of standardized nomenclature has resulted in the use of the same name for different equations, or different names are given two equations that are identical. This affects the ability of drill teams to engage vendors in redesign of performance limitations or to communicate new operational practices between teams or rigs. In addition, this standard corrects a mathematical error that is common in calculating the Total MSE.The concen with the inconsistencies has increased as MSE has become a key element in many automated optimization schemes. Inconsistencies or uncertainties in the basis of MSE values calculated in real time or shared in large data sets will affect the industry's ablity to develop useful analytics or to automate rig control platforms and data-driven decisions.This paper also includes a discussion of the MSE measurement errors and their effect on calculated values, which is of particular interest to controls engineers and those involved in data analytics. Examples are provided to illustrate how the two different MSE values are used in field operations. Also, a substantial reference list of current and potential future uses of MSE is included to encourage better MSE-based practices to potentially lead to the development of new uses in the future, including automation.This ad hoc MSE Standardization Committee is a volunteer group with representation from operators, rig contractors, service companies, and data acquisition vendors. The guidance given reflects there shared experienec in utilizing MSE in surveillance and analytics, and the recommended equations are technically correct.
Reference23 articles.
1. Connection Recipes: Exploring Optimum Connection Practices through a Data-Driven Approach;Ashari,2021
2. Badgwell T. , PastusekP., KrishnanK., and SchmidtD., "Drilling Rig Control Automatic Tuning", U.S. provisional patent application filedOctober9, 2017.
3. Badgwell T. , PastusekP., Kumaran, K., 2018Auto-Driller Automatic Tuning, Presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference & ExhibitionSeptember 24-26, 2018 in Dallas, TX
4. Operators' Group, Rig Contractors, and OEM/Service Company Work to Solve Rig Data Quality Issues;Behounek;Society of Petroleum Engineers,2018
5. Dupriest, F. E. and Koederitz, W. L. 2005. Maximizing Drill Rates with Real-Time Surveillance of Mechanical Specific Energy. Paper presented at theSPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, 23-25 Feb. SPE-92194-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/92194-MS.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献