Advantages of a Compositional Framework for Well and Surface Network Modeling
-
Published:2022-10-31
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:Day 3 Wed, November 02, 2022
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:
Author:
Mogensen Kristian1, Samajpati Swarjit1
Abstract
Abstract
Integrated asset models are being constructed for all ADNOC assets as part of a production optimization initiative supported by a significant digitization effort. Contrary to the standard industry practice of utilizing black-oil formulations to capture fluid behavior, a compositional modeling framework was selected to address some key challenges: Compositional variation at reservoir-level, either lateral or verticalInjection of gas (immiscible as well as near-miscible) causing mass transferBlending of different fluids in the surface network at line conditionsOperational requirement to maintain the bottom-hole pressure above saturation pressureValidation of raw well test data before shrinkage correction (line conditions)Investigation of impact of changing separator settings (affecting shrinkage correction)Tracking of fluid composition in produced streams
The compositional framework is very comprehensive. For each of the 100+ producing reservoirs, one or several equation of state (EOS) models was developed. In every well, an initial fluid composition estimate was provided as an anchoring point, which was subsequently adjusted in a tailor-made workflow to match the solution gas-oil ratio measured in the field by performing an isothermal flash of the original composition and then recombining the flashed oil and gas streams to the field gas-oil ratio.
The workflow offers a number of advantages, one of which is that the path-to-surface correction can be imposed directly on field measurements. This has resulted in much improved allocation factors for oil, gas, and water. Fit-for-purpose algorithms have been developed to perform well test validation for different well types based on raw data at line conditions.
Reference15 articles.
1. Batalov, D.A., Yusupov, R.Y., Zykov, M.A., Zipir, V.G., Gontarev, D.P., Kukushin, V., Baygusov, R., Kraynova, E., Krivokorytova, M., Kharkovsky, A. (2018). Integrated Asset Modeling in West Siberia: A Case Study. SPE-192578-MS, presented at the SPE Annual Caspian Technical Conference and Exhibition, Astana, Kazakhstan, 31 October–2 November 2018. 2. Efimov, D.V., Shlychkov, K.E., Vinogradov, P.V., Sergeev, E.I., Zaynulin, A.V., Dobrin, V.K., Savichev, V.I. (2015). Development of Integrated Modeling Tools for Field with SWAG. SPE-176663-MS, presented at the SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, Moscow, Russia, 26–28 October 2015. 3. Perdido Development: Unified Fluid Model for Integrated-Production-System Modeling;Galvan;SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering,2015 4. Hoda, M.F., Hoffmann, A., Dahouk, M.M., Kuntadi, A., Astutik, W., Juell, A.Whitson, C.H. (2017). Successful Implementations of Integrated Asset Modeling. SPE-187471-MS, presented at the SPE Intelligent Oil and Gas Symposium, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 9–10 May 2017. 5. Marmier, R., Ajiboye, A., Berson, F., Darde, M., Hodbert, V. (2019). Unlocking Marginal Deep Water Fields Development through Reservoir to Surface Integrated Asset Modelling. IPTC-19120-MS, presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Beijing, China, 26–28 March 2019.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|