Hydraulic Fracturing of Horizontal Wells: An Update of Design and Execution Guidelines

Author:

Lietard Olivier1,Ayoub Joseph2,Pearson Anthony3

Affiliation:

1. S.E.P.S. (U.K.) Ltd.

2. Compagnie des Services Dowell Schlumberger

3. Cambridge University

Abstract

Hydraulic Fracturing of Horizontal Wells: An Update of Design and Execution Guidelines Olivier Lietard, SPE, Dowell Division of S.E.P.S. (U.K.) Ltd., Joseph Ayoub, SPE, Compagnie des Services Dowell Schlumberger and Anthony Pearson, Isaac Newton Institute, Cambridge University Abstract Thousands of horizontal wells have been drilled world-wide over the last ten years. Most of them are completed openhole and do not produce as well as expected. In their design phase, adverse reservoir and wellbore effects are often underestimated, such as permeability anisotropy well stand-off, formation damage, formation face damage, and sand control screen plugging. Recent statistical surveys of the production of openhole horizontal wells have confirmed that actual performances are disappointing. They are leading to major reevaluations of drilling and completion strategies in many present reservoir developments. In offshore environments where a limited number of slots are available, horizontal wells remain the best choice. However they are increasingly cased, cemented, perforated and stimulated, in order to alleviate the problems affecting openhole wells. This paper describes how this new trend is expanding in the North Sea, and gives all necessary guidelines to successfully design and execute multiple fracturing treatments in horizontal wells. Production and treatment cost estimates are provided for all cases of fracture orientation vs. the wellbore. Radial flow effects in noncollinear geometry are detailed and Tip Screen Out (TSO) designs recommended. Introduction The number of horizontal wells drilled world-wide so far has become statistically significant, particularly in North America. An increasing number of studies are published concerning the actual performance of openhole horizontal wells, as compared to expectations. The most detailed and famous paper is comparing reservoir development with horizontal wells to gambling, showing that actual Productivity Improvement Factors (PIF's) - as compared to vertical wells - most often equal 2, when equations would promise much larger values (easily in excess of 10 even in primary porosity reservoirs). Short articles have recently emphasised the disappointing outcome of the technology, which seems to give positive results in naturally fractured rocks only (e.g. the Austin chalk trend), whereas economical success in tight gas recovery is not achieved by half the horizontal wells. Causes of poor production of openhole horizontal wells are numerous and will be detailed in this paper. Reservoir development schemes have unfortunately too often disregarded these adverse effects. Overoptimistic production estimates are derived from simplistic equations where permeability anisotropy, well stand-off and skin values are optimistically defaulted. In an offshore environment where economical success is more difficult to achieve, poor actual production has a catastrophic impact, sometimes leading to the cancellation of field development programmes. This is particularly true in the North Sea, where harsher weather conditions and increasing water depths significantly affect the economics of a large number of new fields (particularly West of Shetland). As a consequence, acknowledgements of failure have come sooner than in any other part of the world (relatively to the lifetime of the technology) and countermeasures have rapidly been implemented, sometimes after preliminary onshore testing. This has led to the present scenario whereby all the high rate treatments (hydraulic fracturing or matrix) pumped in the first six months of 1996 by the three available stimulation vessels in the North Sea concern cased and perforated horizontal wells. P. 723

Publisher

SPE

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3