A Case Study on InSAR as a High Frequency Decision Making Tool for SAGD Operations

Author:

Lucente Courtney D1,Koleshwar Ajinkya V1,Falorni Giacomo1

Affiliation:

1. TRE Altamira Inc

Abstract

Abstract Reservoir surveillance is a key component of SAGD operations. There are several widely used surveillance techniques which vary in spatial and temporal coverage, resolution, and cost. The most common of which include pressure and temperature observation wells and 4D seismic. This study aims to demonstrate the value of InSAR as a decision-making tool over operating SAGD pads when used in a coordinated surveillance program alongside existing techniques. Results acquired from conventional surveillance techniques such as 4D seismic are often compared to those from InSAR at the scale of one of the data sets. A frequent challenge when making these comparisons is different acquisition frequency and coverage. This study compares the relative results from each data set to determine if the same conclusions could be drawn from InSAR as from seismic at varying scales. To do this, SAGD wells are divided into segments at various scales (half, third and quarter well). Results from InSAR and 4D seismic are extracted for each segment and statistics analyzed to determine if InSAR and 4D seismic lead to the same relative outcome and thus might lead to the same operational decisions. Results will focus on the ability of InSAR to provide decision making information to SAGD operators like that of other surveillance techniques, but at higher temporal frequency. In particular, the scale at which InSAR provides comparable results to 4D seismic will be investigated and how using InSAR in coordination with seismic may result in more frequent well production optimization. Previous attempts to correlate InSAR to existing SAGD surveillance techniques have shown mixed, though often promising results. Difficulties have arisen from attempts to directly compare discrete InSAR values to those of other techniques, often resulting in poor regression coefficients and a lack of confidence. Qualitative comparisons of gridded surfaces provide little insight on how to utilize the InSAR data. This study will demonstrate the scale at which InSAR can provide information to make operational SAGD decisions.

Publisher

SPE

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3