Challenges in Modeling Coupled Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical-Chemical Processes for CO2 Injection in a North Sea Hydrocarbon Chalk Reservoir
-
Published:2023-06-05
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:Day 2 Tue, June 06, 2023
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:
Author:
Hosseinzadehsadati Seyedbehzad1, Amour Frédéric1, Hajiabadi Mohammad Reza1, M. Nick Hamidreza1
Affiliation:
1. Technical University of Denmark
Abstract
Abstract
CO2 injection in depleted oil and gas reservoirs has become increasingly important as a means of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. This study investigates coupled multiphysics simulations of CO2 injection in chalk reservoirs to better understand the complex thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical (THMC) processes involved. Two compositional models are created: an isothermal model and a non-isothermal model. Since temperature impacts on fluid compositions have introduced errors in estimating the reservoir's compositions, we made certain simplifications on fluid compositions for the thermal model to address this issue. By using the simplified model, we simulate the temperature propagation of cold fluid into a hot reservoir to observe induced thermal stress due to temperature changes. Despite these simplifications for geomechanical modeling, the propagation of CO2 in the depleted gas reservoir was calculated without considering thermal effects, assuming that the density and viscosity of CO2 remained constant with temperature change in the coupled simulation. Our findings provide valuable insights into the THMC processes involved in CO2 injection in the depleted gas reservoir and highlight the importance of accurately modeling thermal effects to improve simulation accuracy.
Reference24 articles.
1. al Assaad, S., Nick, H. M., & Amour, F. (2022). Differences in the plastic and brittle properties of Danian and Maastrichtian reservoir chalk from the North Sea. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 153, 105068. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJRMMS.2022.105068 2. Alcalde, J., Flude, S., Wilkinson, M., Johnson, G., Edlmann, K., Bond, C. E., Scott, V., Gilfillan, S. M. V., Ogaya, X., & Stuart Haszeldine, R. (2018). Estimating geological CO2 storage security to deliver on climate mitigation. Nature Communications 2018 9:1, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04423-1 3. Alhosani, A., Scanziani, A., Lin, Q., Raeini, A. Q., Bijeljic, B., & Blunt, M. J. (2020). Pore-scale mechanisms of CO2 storage in oilfields. Scientific Reports 2020 10:1, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65416-z 4. Amour, F., Christensen, H. F., Hajiabadi, M. R., & Nick, H. M. (2021). Effects of Porosity and Water Saturation on the Yield Surface of Upper Cretaceous Reservoir Chalks From the Danish North Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126(3), e2020JB020608. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB020608 5. Amour, F., Hajiabadi, M. R., Hosseinzadehsadati, S., & M. Nick, H. (2022). Impacts of CO2 Injection on the Compaction Behaviour of Chalk Reservoirs. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.4286144
|
|