Non-Graphical Solutions for Average Reservoir Pressure From Production or Buildup Data

Author:

Arari M.1

Affiliation:

1. U. of Wyoming

Abstract

SPE Member Abstract Simple equations were developed for determination of the distance from wellbore at which the reservoir pressure is the same as average formation pressure. This volumetric averaging method was derived for both constant boundary pressure and no-flow across boundary type of reservoirs. The technique was then extended to transient flow equations to obtain mathematical relationships for determination of average reservoir pressure during either production or buildup periods without the need of a Horner plot or any other published graphs. These equations were then reduced to much simpler forms, by which approximate values of average reservoir pressure could be ascertain within 0.01%, provided that r /r ratio were greater than seven. Two example problems at the end of this paper compare the results of the proposed equations with the ones obtained by using Miller-Dyes-Hutchinson Matthews-Brons-Hazebroek, Dietz, and Ramey-Cobb methods. Furthermore, the examples show that the approximate equations are still providing very accurate results (within 0.1%) inspite of the rinv /re ratio being much less than seven. Introduction The analysis of bottom-hole flowing and shutin pressures for obtaining average reservoir pressure has been the subject of numerous papers. Miller-Byes-Hutchinson (MDH) presented a method of determining the average reservoir pressure by solving the differential equation for fluid flow in a cylindrical reservoir with one well located at the center. Their solution provided dimensionless curves for both constant-boundary pressure and bounded type of reservoirs. By using either of these MDH curves the average reservoir pressure can be determined. The MOH method requires a pseudo-steady state flow condition in the reservoir prior to shut in. Pitzer used the MDH method to obtain theoretical pressure buildup (PBU) curves for few other reservoir geometries. Matthews-Brons-Hazebroek (MBH) developed a method for calculating average pressure in a bounded reservoir. They presented graphs of dimensionless pressure (PDMBH) vs. dimensionless time (tDA) for different drainage-area geometry and well reservoir. The PD MBH and tDA are given as: .....(1) .....(2) p* is extrapolation of P on a Horner PBU plot to where the value of log () equals zero. Kh is determined from the slope of Horner's plot, and t is either the total production or the pseudo-production time (t) prior to shut-in. Based on MBH concept, Dietz developed an equation for determining the average reservoir pressure. His method uses geometrical shape factors (C.) for different well locations and drainage-area geometry. For bounded reservoirs, both Dietz and MBH methods provide identical results if stabilized-flow conditions pseudo-steady state) have prevailed prior to shut-in i.e. when MBH graphs become linear on semi-log plots). .....(3) If geometry of the reservoir is known, then Eqs. 1 through 3 and Horner PBU plot can be used to obtain P at stabilized flow conditions without the use of MBH dimensionless graphs. Eq. 4 developed by Dietz can be used to determine P directly off the Horner plot. This equation gives a t value which when substituted for At. the corresponding P was on the Homer plot equals P. ..........(4) P. 207^

Publisher

SPE

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3