Affiliation:
1. Universal Drilling and Engineering Consultants, Inc.
2. Texas Brine Corp.
Abstract
This paper was prepared for the 42nd Annual California Regional Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, held in Los Angeles, Calif., Nov. 4–5, 1971. Permission to copy is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words. Illustrations may not be copied. The abstract should contain conspicuous acknowledgment of where and by whom the paper is presented. Publication elsewhere after publication in the JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY or the SOCIETY OF publication in the JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY or the SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS JOURNAL is usually granted upon request to the Editor PETROLEUM ENGINEERS JOURNAL is usually granted upon request to the Editor of the appropriate journal provided agreement to give proper credit is made.
Discussion of this paper is invited. Three copies of any discussion should be sent to the Society of Petroleum Engineers office. Such discussion may be presented at the above meeting and, with the paper, may be considered for publication in one of the two SPE magazines.
Abstract
Wellbore damage that occurs during initial well completion or workover operations is the subject of this paper. The linear and radial fluid flow equations are reviewed in relation to this problem and in relation to the laboratory procedures used to test for such damage. procedures used to test for such damage. Return permeability testing methods are discussed, as are the results of such tests. Several commonly used completion and workover fluid systems were compared and these comparisons are included.
The merits of the relatively new and almost nondamaging systems are given. Several cases of their application are discussed in the form of field case studies.
Introduction
A subject that has received a great deal of attention in recent years is that of formation or skin damage around a wellbore. Most of this attention has been directed to the problem of skin damage caused by drilling and cementing productive zones. Such damage normally is of a productive zones. Such damage normally is of a shallow penetrating nature and good perforating, stimulating and completion practices overcome much of the problem. However, poor completion and workover fluids and practices may cause considerable damage to a formation long after the formation was drilled, cemented and perforated. The damage to producing formations caused by workover and completion fluids is the subject of this paper.
Many forces tend to change the natural virgin permeability of producing formations during initial completion and/or workover operations. The net result is usually a reduction in permeability in the vicinity of the wellbore or perforations, and a decreased ability of a well to produce.
Operations considered here to be completion or workover functions include the following: perforating casing, under-reaming pay zones for perforating casing, under-reaming pay zones for gravel-packing, under-reaming injection zones for gravel-packing for disposal purposes, gravel packing, plastic sand consolidating, all workover packing, plastic sand consolidating, all workover operations in which a producing zone must be killed, all workover or completion operations in which wellbore fluids are lost to the formation and drilling into a pay zone after casing has been set on top of the zone.
During the performance of such operations, many conditions exist that can cause formation damage of one or more of the forms:
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献