Fixed-Offshore-Platform Performance in Hurricane Ivan

Author:

Bybee Karen1

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Technology Editor

Abstract

This article, written by Assistant Technology Editor Karen Bybee, contains highlights of paper OTC 18325, "Assessment of Fixed-Offshore-Platform Performance in Hurricane Ivan," by F.J. Puskar, R.E. Spong, and A. Ku, Energo Engineering, and R.B. Gilbert and Y.J. Choi, U. of Texas at Austin, prepared for the 2006 Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 1–4 May. Hurricane Ivan provided an opportunity to evaluate the American Petroleum Inst. (API) RP 2A design process for fixed platforms to ensure that it provides for well-designed structures. Specific findings and trends are reported related to global platform performance as well as component performance. A quantitative assessment to determine the adequacy of the API RP 2A design process uses a probability-based process that compares analytically predicted platform damage and survival to that actually observed after Ivan. Introduction Ivan was one of several hurricanes in the last 12 years that have damaged or destroyed fixed offshore platforms. Previous hurricanes were Andrew in 1992 and Lili in 2002. Katrina and Rita in 2005 also caused significant platform damage and destruction. These types of events provide an opportunity to determine how fixed platforms in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) perform in hurricanes on both a qualitative and quantitative basis. The qualitative basis includes a review of the typical types of damage to topsides and jackets, as well as the general trends observed, such as the number and type of platforms with wave-in-deck damage. The quantitative basis involves the comparison of observed damage with what would have been predicted by API RP 2A, which is the basis for design of fixed platforms in the GOM. This provides a quantified assessment of the accuracy of API RP 2A and whether it is adequate for design. The full-length paper describes these assessments for Ivan on the basis of an in-depth study performed for the U.S. Minerals Management Service focusing on fixed platforms. Path By late afternoon on 15 September 2004, Ivan was in the east-central GOM, approaching the deepwater oil and gas facilities. During this time, the hurricane was a Category 4 storm on the Saffir-Simpson scale, with maximum sustained wind speeds of more than 135 miles/hr. Ivan tracked north over the deepwater facilities in the Mississippi Canyon blocks and into the Viosca Knoll (VK) and Main Pass (MP) block areas. The majority of the destroyed or damaged fixed platforms were in the VK and MP block areas. Ivan continued its northerly track through the eastern edge of the Mobile block area, making landfall as a major hurricane with maximum winds of 130 miles/hr on the early morning of 16 September just west of Gulf Shores, Alabama.

Publisher

Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)

Subject

Strategy and Management,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Industrial relations,Fuel Technology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3