Engineers’ Trilemma: Use and Limitation of Torque and Drag Models

Author:

Samuel Robello1

Affiliation:

1. Halliburton

Abstract

AbstractDifferent methods to calculate torque and drag have been used by the oil industry for years. Various assumptions are used in formulating these models. Opinions have often varied as to which model is better and whether the assumptions are valid. This paper discusses the trilemma considerations for an engineer 1. Soft string model vs stiff string model 2. Survey calculation method based on minimum curvature 3. Appearing and vanishing tortuosities after the casings have been run.Because of various underlying assumptions, the friction factor calibration is done often to match the calculated results with the actual results. This results in a wrong conclusion due to the change in the drag forces but on the contrary, it may be due to the exacerbation of the assumptions. The paper presents the pitfalls of the drillstring models, borehole curvature, appearing and vanishing tortuosities and their relationship with related well engineering calculations. Mathematical underpinnings are provided for all the trilemma considerations.Results demonstrate that a string with a large-size section can be very soft in a straight wellbore, and a string with small-size section can be very stiff in a wellbore with severe tortuosity, which is better fit for a stiff string model. Results also confirm that the soft string model is a better choice when the string is slimmer, the wellbore is in a lower curvature shape, and the clearance is larger. It has been observed that the absence or the discontinuity of bending moment results in the underestimate of forces, torque, and stresses when the minimum curvature method is used. This vanishing tortuosity alters the apparent wellpath and the new tortuosity representative of the cased hole path may present new appearing tortuosity and results in over and under estimation of the torque and drag calculations. To accurately estimate the drag force, the stiffness, as well as the wellbore shape and its clearance, should be considered.

Publisher

SPE

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3