Performance Envelope of a 538-Series High-Speed Helico-Axial Pump for High-Gas-Volume-Fraction Operation

Abstract

Summary Operating at high speeds can have the benefit of increasing the capability of pumps to enhance surface or downhole production of fluids with high gas volume fraction (GVF). This study presents the performance envelope of a high-speed helico-axial pump (HAP) operating at high GVFs (>80%). The ultimate aim of the physical tests was to ascertain the operating capabilities of the pump for potential scaleup to a field prototype. The HAP housing outer diameter was 5.38 in. and operated at a rotational speed of 6,000 rev/min. Air and water were the test fluids, with an average pump intake and a discharge temperature of 28°C. The fluid volume flow rates were varied while maintaining 46 psig at the HAP intake. The liquid and total intake volume flow rates varied from 128 B/D to 664 B/D and 4,941 B/D to 7,593 B/D, respectively. The corresponding dimensionless pressure boost (DPB), GVF, liquid flow coefficients (LFCs), and total flow coefficients (TFCs) were recorded. Additional parameters noted were the percentage of electric current draw to full-load motor current by the HAP motor and the percentage of electric power input to full load power to the HAP motor. The results showed that the HAP had a stable operation during the tests for intake GVF range of 91–98%. The corresponding pump DPB was in the range of 0.0138–0.0751. These values being positive indicated the capability of the HAP to boost fluid pressure even for such high intake gas content and avoid pump gas lock. The results also showed that for a given intake GVF, the HAP DPB increased with decreasing LFC. For a given LFC, the DPB decreased with increasing intake GVF. The percent electric input power to the HAP motor varied between 28% and 64% of full-load motor power. It was observed to strongly increase with decreasing LFC at a given intake GVF and very strongly decrease with increasing intake GVF at a given LFC. The associated percent electric current draw by the HAP motor was seen to vary between 24% and 53% of full-load motor current. Its variation with LFC and intake GVF was similar to those of the percent electric power input. The DPB, percent electric current, and power draw by the HAP motor variations with TFC for a given intake GVF were similar to those of the LFCs. In conclusion, the HAP demonstrated the capability to boost fluid pressure when handling high GVF flows. It is being scaled up to a field prototype to handle higher volume flow rates of high GVF gas-liquid mixtures. This study mainly highlights the method to extend the gas-handling capability of a HAP by operating it at high speeds. Optimal hydraulic design and proper conditioning of the inlet flow components were also incorporated into the HAP architecture. Expanding the HAP operating envelope to handle high-GVF flows significantly unlocks the potential for field operators to maximize hydrocarbon production from high-gas content applications. This, in turn, increases the economic bottom line from the field asset.