Ratings Standardization for Production Packers

Author:

Fothergill John1

Affiliation:

1. Baker Oil Tools

Abstract

Abstract Longstanding ambiguity surrounding performance ratings for production packers continues to be a topic of concern, as increasingly demanding completion environments drive more critical product selection processes. Inconsistencies in manufacturer testing methodologies and design validation procedures have previously not supported a quality selection process. Completion engineers, not equipped with a thorough understanding of the nuances of packer performance characteristics under various load conditions, have been dependent upon the technical expertise and good faith of the manufacturer. This paper gives the completion engineer a working understanding of applied packer performance ratings. The evolution of qualifying testing procedures is discussed, as well as the most recent advancements in the standardization process. Ratings standardization set forth in ISO 14310, establishing both quality control and design validation grades, is described. Completion engineers and other decision makers, as well as salesmen need this information for informed product comparisons and proper matching of product to application. Introduction This paper is to provide the information necessary for critical evaluation of only one component in the completion system. Although beyond the scope of this paper, it is important to recognize how the entire system must also be critically evaluated. If the value of accurate well data is not self evident, it should become so through the discussion of how that criteria effects the packer. The near infinite variety of oil and gas completion scenarios makes detailed discussion of applications impractical, but good completion planning practices will ensure that some specific information is consistently available in the completion planning process, including:Casing/Liner and tubing dataDogleg severity and well bore deviationInitial bottomhole pressureBottomhole temperatureWellbore preparationPerforatingCompletion fluidsSpecific hostile conditions / CRA requirementsAnticipated life of the completionProduction media and ratesAnticipated stimulation conditions over the life of the completionMulti-zone flow control requirementsID compatibilityMinimum bottomhole pressureLanding conditionsPacker setting requirements and limitationsWell intervention With the requirements and limitations of the applications clearly defined, cost comparisons and the economic benefit of any proposed value enhancing features in the system can be fairly evaluated. This statement is true only if the completion engineer can trust in the validity of claims made by the manufacturer and there is a standard in place supporting those claims. The implications of product liability have historically guided manufacturers to limit their recommendations to a product perceived adequate for the application. Fringe applications that stretch product limitations increasingly drive the need for standardization in today's environments.

Publisher

SPE

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3