Abstract
Abstract
The combination of conventional logs such as density, neutron and resistivity logs is proven to be very effective in the evaluation of normal reservoirs. For low resistivity reservoirs, however, an accurate determination of the petrophysical parameters with the conventional log reservoirs is very difficult. This paper presents two cases of low resistivity reservoirs and low contrast resistivity reservoirs where conventional logs fail to determine the petrophysical properties of reservoirs, mainly, low resistivity and low contrast resistivity reservoirs. The problems of these reservoirs is that conventional logging interpretation shows high water saturation zones, but water free hydrocarbon would be produced. In the case of low resistivity contrast reservoirs it is very hard to determine water hydrocarbon contact with resistivity logs. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) has been only available as a supplement tool, to provide additional information on the producibility of the reservoir. The main limitation of NMR, however, has been the cost and time of acquiring data.
This paper shows that in the case of low resistivity reservoirs NMR is very cost-effective tool and helps to accurately determine the reservoir rock petrophysical properties. In the analysis of NMR data, several aspects of NMR technique have been used;T1/T2 ratio for fluid identification,the difference between NMR derived porosity and total porosity to determine the types of clay minerals,NMR relaxation properties to identify fluids nature and rock properties.
This paper presents four examples of low resistivity reservoirs. Analysis of NMR data of low resistivity reservoirs has helped to identify the producibility of these zones, to determine lithology independent porosity and to distinguish between bound and free water. For the case of low contrast resistivity reservoir where there was little resistivity contrast between water bearing formation and oil bearing formation, NMR has been able to identify the fluid nature of the two formations and then the height of the oil column. This was based mainly on high contrast of NMR relaxation parameters.
Introduction
In formation evaluation, resistivity logs are the mains pay zones identifiers because of resistivity contrast between oil zone and water zone. If, however, a pay zone exhibits low resistivity, these logs become incapable of identifying the producing zones and also of indicating water mobility. Because of this limitation, many potentially productive zones with high irreducible water saturation are overlooked. Control of water production and identification of low resistivity pay zones with high irreducible water saturation of two formation evaluation problems in many fields in the Middle East and other fields around the world.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献