Facilitating Directional Drilling Work to Reach the Target Entry by Calculating a Safe Operating Envelope
Author:
Saavedra Jerez L.1, Cayeux E.2, Sui D.1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Energy and Petroleum Engineering, University of Stavanger UiS, Stavanger, Rogaland, Norway 2. NORCE Norwegian Research Center AS / DigiWells, Stavanger, Rogaland, Norway
Abstract
Abstract
Nowadays, complex 3D trajectories are handled with a succession of circular arcs. Although they have constant curvature, their toolface is not constant. Consequently, directional drillers must adjust the toolface regularly to reach the target entry within its tolerances. This paper investigates the use of the constant curvature and constant toolface curve (CTC in short) as an alternative to the circular arc to facilitate the directional drilling work to reach the target entry within its boundaries.
The problem is addressed by calculating a safe operating envelope (SOE) to reach the boundaries of the target entry. The target entry tolerance is discretized as a polygon. From the current bit position and its direction, the possible choices of curvatures and toolfaces are obtained in order to reach the edges of the target entry shape. The SOE can be calculated with the circular arc or with the CTC curve. It is, therefore, possible to compare the advantages and disadvantages of both types of curves to attain the target entry and stay within its boundaries.
The circular arc is shorter than the CTC curve. However, it requires adjusting the toolface during the navigation, which is not the case with the CTC curve. As a result, the directional driller can easily control the bottom hole assembly (BHA) direction such that the well lands within the target entry limits by using set-points for toolface and curvature inside the calculated SOE. Furthermore, a new way to represent the SOE is introduced. It makes use of a 3D cylindrical representation where the curvature is mapped as the height of a cylinder, while the toolface corresponds to the azimuth in the cylindrical coordinate system, and the length is linked to the radial distance. This provides a visual aid to understand the SOE. Moreover, this visualization helps to appreciate the relationship of the initial bit location and direction in the construction of the SOE and how the margins increase in a particular manner as the bit approaches the target entry polygon.
The CTC curve is the natural one followed by directional positive displacement motors (PDM) or rotary steerable systems (RSS). Potentially, the CTC curve may be a door-opening solution to automated directional drilling control as it is easier to be followed by both PDM and RSS.
Reference23 articles.
1. Cayeux, E., Dvergsnes, E., Carlsen, L., & Mihai, R. (2022). An Ensemble-Based Solution for Automating Drilling Engineering: Application to Directional Surveying. Proc., IADC/SPE International Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Texas, 8–10 March, IADC/SPE-208791-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/208791-MS 2. Cayeux, E., Genevois, J.-M., Crepin, S., & Thibeau, S. (2001). Well Planning Quality Improved Using Cooperation between Drilling and Geosciences. Proc., SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September-3 October, SPE-71331-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/71331-MS 3. Cheraghi, Y., Alyaev, S., Hong, A., Kuvaev, I., Clark, S., Zhuralvlev, A., & Bratvold, R. B. (2022). What Can We Learn After 10,000 Geosteering Decisions?Proc., Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Texas, 20–22 June, URTeC: 3722510. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2022-3722510 4. Improving Collision Avoidance and Target Accuracy in an Offshore Brownfield Redevelopment Combining Gyros and In-Field Referencing;Costeno,2014 5. Gomez, C., Nunez, C., & Samuel, R. (2018). Integrated Analytical Trajectory Control Model. Proc., IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Texas, 6–8 March, IADC/SPE-189708-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/189708-MS
|
|