Abstract
Abstract
The Bonga field is in its late stage Phase-3 development. Infill wells are drilled to target oil in the bypassed or unswept areas of the reservoirs. Unlike the earlier phases of development, the current wells have complex trajectories and are hooked up via crowded subsea manifolds. Because oflimited availability of drilling centers, most of the new wells are extended reach with narrow drilling margins.
The target reservoirs are relatively thinner, poorly developed, and more limited in extent and size compared to targets in the earlier phases, increasing inherent subsurface uncertainties. With an expected low case ultimate recovery per well of roughly 10–15 MMstb, and average deepwater well cost of +/- $40 million, the stakes were high and hence critical to get it right the first time. If net-sand is poor or short because of suboptimal landing or well placement in the reservoir, the well objective (recovery and rate) can easily be compromised and could require drilling a sidetrack with additional attendant cost. Longer exposure length of drain hole (reservoir section) was known to improve well production rates hence an essential component of the well plan.
To address these challenges and ensure the wells achieve their objectives and deliver their economic value, a geosteering technology (Reservoir Mapping While Drilling tool—GeoSphere) was adopted for optimal landing above the target reservoir(s) and placement within the reservoir channel sands using the Multilayer Distance to Boundary technology (PeriScopeHD). The deployment of geosteering technology was considered to be a success in enabling better sand exposures of the wells in the target sections, thus achieving the well objectives.
This paper discusses the implementation of geosteering technology and learnings from two case studies in the Bonga infill campaign.
Reference10 articles.
1. Pokima, S., Afolabi, R., Fakunle, O.
2015. Bonga Northwest Subsurface Development—Planning, Execution and Uncertainty Management. Paper presented at theOffshore Technology Conference held in Houston, Texas, USA, 4–7 May 2015. OTC-25943-MS.
2. Beer, R., Claudio, L., Dias, T.
2010. Geosteering and/or Reservoir Characterization: The Prowess of New Generation LWD Tools. Paper presented at theSPWLA 51st Annual Logging Symposium, Perth, Australia, 19–23 June. 2010-93320.
3. Constable, M.V., Antonsen, F., Olsen, P.A.
2012. Improving Well Placement and Reservoir Characterization with Deep Directional Resistivity Measurements. Paper presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio Texas, USA, 8–10 October. SPE 159621.
4. Dupuis, C., Omeragic, D., Chen, Y.-H.
2013. Workflow to Image Unconformities with Deep Electromagnetic LWD Measurements Enables Well Placement in Complex Scenarios. Paper presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 30 September–2 October. SPE 166117.
5. Jenkins, S., Sims, A., Oldham, E.
2012. De-risking a Horizontal Well through Application of New Deep Directional Resistivity Tool to Equate Seismic Data with Borehole Data. Paper presented at theSPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Perth, Australia, 22–24 October. SPE 158040.