Abstract
Abstract
In fluvial, multi-layer, tight-gas program, the acquisition of microseismic data together with the development of stress models and production models can significantly influence a development program. Often, the lack of data gathering pre and post microseismic acquisition introduces knowledge gaps that demonstrate inconsistencies between the various engineering domains. In this study, varying completion strategies and monitoring techniques were implemented together with postfracture modeling and production modeling (via rate-transient analysis techniques) to understand and explain the location of microseismic events.
This paper presents the agreements and differences observed between the stress models developed (and fracture diversion/limited entry observations), fracture half-lengths (from fracture modeling and production analysis), microseismic events and current geological understanding.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献