Breaker Placement in Sand Control Lower Completions – New Challenges and Potential Solutions

Author:

Byrne M.1,Djayapertapa L.1,Watson K1

Affiliation:

1. Axis, Aberdeen, UK

Abstract

Abstract Production and injection wells for oil and gas and carbon storage reservoirs often require sand control across the reservoir section to enable fluids to flow and to prevent larger formation solids from moving. In many of these wells, chemical breaker treatments are pumped prior to production or injection to help to reduce any drilling or completion induced formation or completion damage. Delivering these breakers to the target such as residual drilling mud cake can be challenging and rules of thumb have often been used to guide this process. More rigorous methods to optimise breaker placement and design are now available. CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) enables fluid flow in complex geometries to be modelled and predicted. Breaker placement during the well completion process involves the complex geometry of the well, the lower completion and the reservoir and fluid flow or displacement. The full geometry of vertical or horizontal wells, with induced fractures, multiple wellbores, perforations or mini-bores should and can be captured using CFD. Breaker pumping whether bull-headed, through a wash pipe, coiled tubing or more sophisticated rotating and jetting needs to be simulated in order to determine its efficiency. Numerous simulations for different well types, completions and breaker deployment methods have revealed that even with the best intentions and rules of thumb, it can be challenging to place breaker to the target and for breaker concentrations required for efficient dissolution of residual damage to be maintained. In particular gravel packed completions present challenges. Fluids will always take the path of least resistance and in gravel packed completions this is often back up the well between the wash pipe and the screens missing the intended target. The additional resistance of the gravel in the annulus tends to prevent efficient breaker penetration to mud cake or perforations beyond. If the breaker does penetrate, then coverage of the damaged zone can be patchy and early losses can result. Simulations have also identified potential mitigations such as alternative deployment rates, displacement fluids prior to breakers and duration of breaker placement. The benefits of targeted breaker placement during pump and pull or jetting operations has also been evaluated. Challenges in placing breaker effectively in sand controlled wells are addressed using complex numerical modelling. Replicating well geometry and all fluid flow paths are essential in order to optimise breaker placement and reduce residual formation and completion damage. The methods and examples shared will enable more effective clean-up of oil, gas, water, hydrogen and CO2 wells.

Publisher

SPE

Reference7 articles.

1. Byrne, M., Djayapertapa, L., Watson, K., Fleming, N., Taugbøl, K., - 2022, SPE-208852 Understanding Fluid Exchange as Screens are Run In Hole – Mitigation of Formation and Completion Damage Risks,

2. Predicting Well Inflow Using Computational Fluid Dynamics—Closer to the Truth?;Byrne,2009

3. SPE 165115 Formation Damage Matters;Byrne,2013

4. SPE 168149 Complex Completion Design and Inflow Prediction Enabled by Detailed Numerical Well Modeling;Byrne,2014

5. Using Computational Fluid Dynamics for Aerodynamics, Stanford University Technical Report;Jameson

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3