Optimal Heavy Oil Waterflood Management May Differ From that of Light Oils

Author:

Vittoratos E..1,West C. C.2

Affiliation:

1. Consultant to BP

2. BP

Abstract

Abstract Current paradigms and regulatory mandates implicitly assume that waterflood reservoir management practices successful in light oils can be extended unmodified to heavier oils. In particular, complete voidage replacement is considered optimal irrespective of oil chemistry; furthermore, it is assumed that the Buckley-Leverett multi-phase flow formulation, successful in light oils, is equally applicable with heavier crudes. Surprisingly, despite the paramount importance of these concepts to successful reservoir management, there is little public domain documentation on any empirical tests of these assumptions using field data. We here report that our ongoing empirical examination has accumulated observations that suggest that optimal heavy oil waterflood management may differ from that of light oils. The literature has anecdotal accounts of the difficulty of maximizing oil recovery for heavy oil reservoirs while attempting to achieve complete voidage replacement. In the North Slope of Alaska, efforts to maximize oil production early in the waterflooding of isolated hydraulic blocks have led to a VRR < 1. For heavy oils, we have previously identified a flow regime with WOR ∼ 1 for extended periods of time prevalent for reservoirs worldwide. In Alaska, where we possess detailed fluid, well and reservoir information, we have correlated this regime with hydraulic units with incomplete voidage replacement. The WOR ∼ 1 flow regime can be interpreted as a water-in-oil emulsion flow which is intrinsic to the water/oil system chemistry and not to the details of the reservoir stratification, explaining its widespread prevalence. Laboratory heavy oil waterfloods with a VRR = 0.7 recover more oil than those with VRR = 1, and provide evidence of in-situ water-in-oil emulsion formation. Furthermore, the laboratory floods suggest that the recovery prize for optimal voidage strategy may be estimated by a simple heuristic equation: optimal recovery process (VRRopt) ∼ recovery pure waterflood (VRR = 1) + recovery pure solution gas drive (VRR = 0).

Publisher

SPE

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3