The Use of Special Coring and Logging Procedures for Defining Reservoir Residual Oil Saturations

Author:

Murphy R.P.1,Owens W.W.1

Affiliation:

1. Amoco Production Co.

Abstract

The Use of Special Coring and Logging Procedures for Defining Reservoir Procedures for Defining Reservoir Residual Oil Saturations Under certain conditions, data obtained from pressure cores, from core flow tests, and through log-inject-log procedures can yield reliable values for residual oil saturation at a given location within a waterflooded area. This is adequate for planning a pilot program. If a reliable reservoir-wide estimate is needed, however, several wells in different areas of the reservoir must be cored or logged. Introduction During the producing life of a reservoir, it is not unusual to make estimates of oil in place and recoverable reserves for three different phases of production - primary, secondary, and tertiary. The production - primary, secondary, and tertiary. The economics of primary and secondary recovery programs is usually so attractive that considerable error in the estimates of recoverable reserves can be tolerated. However, a much greater degree of confidence is needed in the estimates of tertiary reserves. This is because most tertiary recovery processes cost more per barrel of oil recovered than do primary or per barrel of oil recovered than do primary or secondary. In addition, the total volume of tertiary oil recovery may be lower than that of either primary or secondary. In estimating the oil in place before a secondary or tertiary recovery program, both the volume of oil and its distribution within the reservoir are important. Several methods are currently being used to measure the reservoir oil saturation. For purposes of this discussion, we shall refer to these as "conventional methods of measurement" and discuss them briefly in the following section. Two less conventional and more recently developed methods, which are the primary subject of this paper, are discussed in a later primary subject of this paper, are discussed in a later section and are referred to as "specialized coring and logging procedures". Conventional Methods of Measurement Material Balance Probably the first method to be developed and the one Probably the first method to be developed and the one still most widely used for determining reservoir oil volume is based upon material balance concepts. With this approach, the volume of oil remaining in the reservoir at any stage of depletion is found by subtracting the volume of produced oil (accounting for shrinkage) from the original volume of oil in place. Since the volume of produced oil is usually known precisely, the accuracy of this approach depends precisely, the accuracy of this approach depends entirely upon the reliability of the original oil-in-place estimate. While this method of analysis may yield a reliable value for the total volume of oil remaining in the reservoir. it does not define the distribution of the oil. Knowledge of the oil saturation distribution, both laterally and vertically within the reservoir, can be a critical factor in the planning of a secondary or tertiary recovery program. Interpretation of Standard Core Analysis When a formation is cored conventionally with a water-filtrate type of mud, the oil and water saturations in the cores, when analyzed, may be of limited use in defining reservoir saturations. Invasion of filtrate into the cores during coring, and subsequent expulsion of fluids by gas expansion as the core travels to the surface can contribute to serious alterations in core oil and water saturations. There are conditions, however, under which the core saturations at the surface may be quite similar to those in the reservoir. JPT P. 841

Publisher

Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)

Subject

Strategy and Management,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Industrial relations,Fuel Technology

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3