Affiliation:
1. Oilfield Data Services, Inc.
Abstract
Abstract
This article will address two issues related to sand production in unconsolidated reservoirs. First, it will examine the relationship between formation compressibility (Cf), elasto-plastic hysteresis and the shear failure of the formation macroscopically (when the fluid and formation pressure together cannot support the overburden stress), as well as the methodology to predict this failure pressure. Second, it will explore the means to recognize which formations are more friable and likely to produce sand grains – microscopic shear failure. The two effects are only tangentially related but can occur simultaneously.
Logs and petrophysical data should be methodolically used to qualitatively and quantitatively assess the sanding potential of a well or reservoir. The first method is evaluating the compressibility of formation rocks as they first demonstrate elasto-plasticity, then have catastrophic shear failure. The other method evaluates the sanding potential based on the friability of the formation.
The most effective way to manage/mitigate catastrophic/macroscopic shear failure is to observe the dynamic behavior of the reservoir. By plotting the build-up permeability vs. skin-less FBHP, the failure pressure of the formation can be determined. Good operating practices then dictate that the well should not be flowed at pressures below the value plus a safety factor. The approach to managing potential sand grain failure (microscopic shear failure) is to design the completion (frac-pack, gravel pack, etc.) to collect the sand grains in the pack and screens, then perform periodic pump-in stimulation treatments to push the fines away from the screens/pack. Two examples each from the Gulf of Mexico and the Louisiana Gulf Coast will be presented to demonstrate the methodology for both macroscopic and microscopic shear failure.
It should be noted that it is important to differentiate the cause of sand production/fines migration as one of the two (macro/micro) causes. This can be determined by tracking the accretion of skin due to fines. If this occurs coincident with a decrease in permeability or mobility thickness, it should be assumed that the cause is macroscopic shear failure. If the permeability remains constant as skin due to fines increases, it is due to microscopic shear failure. Technically, both mechanisms can occur simultaneously, but it is best to approach the issue conservatively and assume that any increase in skin due to fines that occurs with a decrease in mobility thickness is due to macroscopic shear failure. Applying the sanding potential systematically to formation evaluation can improve the completion design; predicting the macroscopic shear failure pressure of the formation contributes to better overall reservoir management.
Reference4 articles.
1. Application of Logging Data in Predicting Sand Production in Oilfield;Dong;Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2013
2. Sharma, O.P. and Arya, O.P.
2006. Formation Strength Estimation from Well Log Data for Sand Cut Analysis in Tapti – Daman Area, Western Offshore Basin, India. 6th International Conference & Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics"Kolkata 2006". https://www.academia.edu/43184601/Formation_Strength_Estimation_From_Well_Log_Data_For_Sand_Cut_Analysis_in_Tapti_Daman_Area_Western_Offshore_Basin_India
3. Modified Approach for Identifying Weak Zones for Effective Sand Management;Sulaimon;Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology,2020
4. Estimation of Formation Strength from the Mechanical-Properties Log;Tixier;Journal of Petroleum Technology,1975
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献