Wellbore Stability Performance of Water Base Mud Additives

Author:

Ewy Russell T.1,Morton Edward Keith2

Affiliation:

1. Chevron ETC

2. Chevron Corp.

Abstract

Abstract A critical property for many water-base muds is the ability to prevent near-wellbore pore pressure increase in shales. By slowing or preventing this pressure rise, a true overbalance pressure is maintained, which promotes wellbore stability. Using a device that simulates downhole rock stress and overbalance fluid pressure conditions, and using preserved shale samples, we tested four different muds containing different additives. Direct measurements of shale pore pressure vs. time were obtained, representing the pore pressure inside the wall of the wellbore. All muds slowed the loss of overbalance pressure compared to a base-case brine fluid, but two muds were very effective at slowing and/or preventing the loss of overbalance. One active mechanism appears to be an increase in the osmotic membrane efficiency, but permeability measurements conducted during these same tests show that physical plugging of the pore space is also an important mechanism for these two fluids. Measurements of fluid-induced swelling were also conducted in this same set of tests, and all four muds resulted in less swelling than the base-case brine. The most effective fluid was repeat-tested using a completely different shale, and it again was found to be very effective at preventing near-wellbore pore pressure increase. Introduction One of the main shale instability mechanisms that occurs with water-based drilling fluids is that the wellbore pressure penetrates into the shale pore space. This raises the near-wellbore pore pressure and reduces the true overbalance. This reduction of true overbalance, which acts like a support pressure for the hole, can result in shale failure and wellbore instability. The pressure penetration cannot be prevented with standard filtration additives, because shale pores are extremely small (~0.01 micron) and shale permeability is extremely low (typically ~0.01 microdarcy or less); therefore a filter cake does not develop on shales. With oil-based muds, pressure penetration into the shale pore space generally does not occur. This is because of the following:There is a high capillary entry pressure for the non-aqueous fluid phase.A good osmotic membrane exists (as long as the emulsion is stable), enabling the salt content of the water-phase to prevent osmotic transfer of water into the shale. Water-based muds in the past have rarely been effective at building an osmotic membrane or at preventing hydraulic flow into the shale. The industry has attempted in recent years to develop water-based muds that perform like oil-based muds, especially with regard to shale stability. To test the effectiveness of different brines, additives, and muds at preventing near-wellbore pore pressure increase, various laboratory test methods have been used. The test is usually called a ‘pressure transmission’ test or a ‘membrane efficiency’ test. Examples of test methods/devices and results can be found in several references (Mody & Hale 1993, van Oort et al 1995, van Oort et al 1996, Ewy and Stankovich 2000, Stowe et al 2001, Schlemmer et al 2003a, Mody et al 2002, Ewy & Stankovich 2002, Schlemmer et al 2003b, Dye et al 2005). Most of these methods rely on similar principles to those used for measuring osmotic membrane behavior of compacted clays many years ago (e.g. Fritz & Marine 1983), although shale testing can be much more complicated. The early tests focused mainly on brines or brines with single additives, while later tests focused on multiple additives and/or more complete mud systems. Depending on the device and test method employed, one can isolate just the osmotic pressure effects, or just the hydraulic effects, or measure the combined effects simultaneously. Some studies have focused mostly on development of highosmotic- efficiency membranes, while others have focused mostly on physical plugging of shale pores, and some have focused on both. It could be argued that, to be truly effective, a water-base drilling fluid must be effective at both of these mechanisms.

Publisher

SPE

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3