Assimilation of Geophysics-Derived Spatial Data for Model Calibration in Geologic CO2 Sequestration

Author:

Chen Bailian1ORCID,Morales Misael M.2ORCID,Ma Zhiwei3ORCID,Kang Qinjun3,Pawar Rajesh J.3

Affiliation:

1. Los Alamos National Laboratory (Equal contributor; Corresponding author)

2. Los Alamos National Laboratory (Equal contributor)

3. Los Alamos National Laboratory

Abstract

Summary Uncertainty in geological models usually leads to large uncertainty in the predictions of risk-related system properties and/or risk metrics (e.g., CO2 plumes and CO2/brine leakage rates) at a geologic CO2 storage site. Different types of data (e.g., point measurements from monitoring wells and spatial data from 4D seismic surveys) can be leveraged or assimilated to reduce the risk predictions. In this work, we develop a novel framework for spatial data assimilation and risk forecasting. Under the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Risk Assessment Partnership (NRAP), we have developed a framework using an ensemble-based data assimilation approach for spatial data assimilation and forecasting. In particular, we took CO2 saturation maps interpreted from 4D seismic surveys as inputs for spatial data assimilation. Three seismic surveys at Years 1, 3, and 5 were considered in this study. Accordingly, three saturation maps were generated for data assimilation. The impact from the level of data noise was also investigated in this work. Our results show increased similarity between the updated reservoir models and the “ground-truth” model with the increased number of seismic surveys. Predictive accuracy in CO2 saturation plume increases with the increased number of seismic surveys as well. We also observed that with the increase in the level of data noise from 1% to 10%, the difference between the updated models and the ground truth does not increase significantly. Similar observations were made for the prediction of CO2 plume distribution at the end of the CO2 injection period by increasing the data noise.

Publisher

Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)

Reference32 articles.

1. Arts, R., Chadwick, A., Eiken, O. et al. 2003. Interpretation of the 1999 and 2001 Time-Lapse Seismic Data (WP5. 4). TNO Report, NITG 03-064. Netherlands Institute of Applied Geoscience TNO, National Geological Society, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

2. Time-Lapse Reservoir Property Change Estimation from Seismic Using Machine Learning;Cao;Lead Edge,2017

3. Quantitative Analysis of Time-Lapse Seismic Monitoring Data at the Sleipner CO2 Storage Operation;Chadwick;Lead Edge,2010

4. Reducing Uncertainty in Geologic CO2 Sequestration Risk Assessment by Assimilating Monitoring Data;Chen;Int J Greenh Gas Control,2020

5. Dynamic Risk Assessment for Geologic CO2 Sequestration;Chen;Gondwana Res,2023

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3