Precise Fracture Initiation Using Dynamic Fluid Movement Allows Effective Fracture Development in Deviated Wellbores

Author:

Eberhard Michael J.1,Surjaatmadja Jim1,Peterson Ellis M.2,Lockman Russell R.1,Grundmann Steven R.1

Affiliation:

1. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.

2. Flying J. Oil & Gas, Inc.

Abstract

Abstract In deviated wellbores with long perforated intervals, conventional fracture initiation with wellbore pressurization often creates multiple fracture initiations, resulting in severe fracture tortuosity. When this happens, treatments are generally plagued with high injection pressures, low injection rates and, quite often, early screenouts. One solution to the problem of multiple fractures is to use the fluid's own dynamic movement to divert flow to a specific point. This method accurately positions and directs fracture initiation. With proper planning, a single fracture can be initiated and proppant can be easily placed without tortuosity effects. This paper discusses the use of the dynamic fluid movement treatment in a well positioned on an incline through the pay section. Premature screenout had occurred when proppant first entered the formation on a previous treatment attempt, and fracture modeling indicated that multiple fractures were the apparent cause of the screenout. When the dynamic fluid movement method was used on a subsequent treatment, a fracture was initiated properly, and a large proppant treatment was placed successfully. Introduction The North Grieve Unit (NGU) 23–23 is located in the North Grieve Field, 40 miles west of Casper, WY, in the southeast portion of the Wind River Basin (Fig. 1, Page 5). The formation, discovered in 1973, produces from channel-deposited Cretaceous Muddy Sandstone at a depth of approximately 10,000 ft. At North Grieve, the Muddy reservoir dips 30° to the northeast with the sand deposited on a north-south axis. Wells are deviated up to 30° to the southwest at Muddy depth, caused in part by the steeply dipping beds and natural bit drift that occurred while drilling. The Muddy produces 45° API "sweet" oil with fluid expansion and gravity drainage as principal drive mechanisms. A secondary gas cap formed early in the reservoir, and continuous gas reinjection has occurred into the gas cap since 1987. At present, gas cycling continues, with mixed natural gas liquid recovery of approximately 140 B/D and oil production of 100 BOPD. Two active gas-injection wells and four producing wells, including the subject well, are located in the North Grieve Field. Well NGU 23–23 This well, originally completed in April 1987 in the Muddy without stimulation, had an initial production of 193 BOPD, 183 Mcf/D of gas, and no water production. A core taken in the productive Muddy had average porosity of 13.2% and average air permeability of 64 md. In January 1995, after producing approximately 232,000 STBO, the operator attempted to side-track the well downdip to a more oil-productive position below the secondary gas cap. The first sidetrack attempt penetrated margins of the Muddy channel without encountering any net pay. In late 1995, a second sidetrack was drilled slightly updip and encountered 25 ft of net pay with log parameters similar to the original productive wellbore. The wellbore consists of 5½-in. N-80 casing cemented at a measured depth of 10,435 ft with a deviation of 26° at Muddy depth. The second sidetrack was underbalanced-perforated from 10,301 to 10,326 ft with 4 shots per foot at 90° phasing. Pressure surveys indicated an adequate reservoir pressure of 3,100 psi, but the well failed to produce commercially. In December 1995, the operator attempted a fracture stimulation treatment with 20/40-mesh sand and gelled crude oil. The treatment screened out early, resulting in only an estimated 8,000 lbm of sand being placed in the formation. Subsequent efforts to produce the well failed to recover economical quantities of oil, and the well was shut in during January 1996. A new operator became responsible for the field. After continued periodic pressure surveys indicated that the reservoir in the vicinity of this well was not being drained, the new operator planned another fracture treatment attempt late in 1999.

Publisher

SPE

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3