Restoring Competency for Execution: The Paradoxical Debate Continues with the Case ofSingleton v. Norris-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

Restoring Competency for Execution: The Paradoxical Debate Continues with the Case ofSingleton v. Norris

Published:2005-09-27 Issue:3 Volume:5 Page:55-68
ISSN:1522-8932
Container-title:Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice

Author:

Hensl Kursten B.

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Applied Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Link

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1300/J158v05n03_03

Reference40 articles.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Choosing the Lesser of Two Evils: A Framework for Considering the Ethics of Competency-for-Execution Evaluations;Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice;2010-03-24

2. Elucidating the Contours of Competency for Execution: The Implications of Ford and Panetti for Assessment;The Journal of Psychiatry & Law;2009-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP