Abstract
Long before the prosecution of individuals for witchcraft was rendered a legal impossibility in the states of modern Europe, the judicial and executive institutions of those states and their precursors were decisive in both legitimating and moderating, facilitating and constraining the detection, trial, and execution of alleged witches. If we are to impute more than unresolved cognitive dissonance to this paradoxical relationship of the apparatus of state to the perceived reality and threat of witchcraft, then the preconditions and contextual factors predicating that relationship bear investigation. This paper identifies genealogical traces of criminological, political, social, and religious thought embedded within several pivotal bodies of early-modern law pertaining to witchcraft, and attempts to infer the cultural, institutional, and textual sources and conditions from which they derive.
Reference27 articles.
1. von Bar, C. L. (1916) A History of Continental Criminal Law. Translated by T. S. Bell. Little, Brown, and Co., Boston.
2. Bever, E. (2008) The Realities of Witchcraft and Popular Magic in Early Modern Europe. Palgrave, New York.
3. "Witchcraft Studies in Austria, Germany and Switzerland";Behringer;In Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe,1996
4. "Moral Arithmetic: Seven Sins Into Ten Commandments";Bossy;In Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe edited by Leiters E Cambridge University Press Cambridge,1988
5. "Witchcraft Repealed";Bostridge;In Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe,1996