Abstract
Thus far, the genus Senecio L. in Chile has only been thoroughly revised by the Argentinian botanist Cabrera, who published a monograph in 1949. He treated 11 names as dubious, 10 of which have remained unresolved until now. Herein, the taxonomic position of six names is elucidated, i.e., S. alsophilus Phil., S. araucanus Phil., S. leiophyllus Turcz., S. rufescens DC., S. simpsonii Phil., and S. tenuicaulis Phil. Moreover, the priority name for the illegitimate S. glaber Less. is indicated, the name S. botijae C. Ehrh. is synonymized with S. calcicola Meyen & Walp., and S. borchersii Phil. is synonymized with S. hakeifolius Bertero ex DC. The names S. araucanus, S. hakeifolius, S. leiophyllus, and S. tocornalii Phil. are lectotypified; likewise, S. alsophilus and S. simpsonii are neotypified.
Subject
Plant Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference38 articles.
1. Burdet H.M. 2008. Collections De Candolle: catalogue des collecteurs botaniques. Éditions HMB, Genève. [DVD: Collecteurs de Candolle].
2. Cabrera A.L. 1935. Notas sobre los Senecio sudamericanos, II. Notas del Museo de la Plata. Botánica 1: 11-33.
3. Cabrera A.L. 1949. El género Senecio en Chile. Lilloa 15: 27-501.
4. Cabrera A.L. 1954. Senecios sudamericanos nuevos o críticos. Darwiniana 10: 547-605.
5. Cabrera A.L. 1955. Notas sobre los Senecio sudamericanos, VIII. Notas del Museo de La Plata. Botánica 18 (89): 191-240.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献