On Proof Complexities Relations in Some Systems of Propositional Calculus

Author:

Tamazyan Hakob1,Chubaryan Anahit1

Affiliation:

1. Yerevan State University

Abstract

The number of linear proofs steps for some sets of formulas is compared in the folowing systems of propositional calculus: PK – seguent system with cut rule, PK— - the same system without cut rule, SPK – the same system with substitution rule, QPK – the same system with quantifier rules. The number of steps of tree-like proofs in the same systems for some considered set of formulas is compared from Alessandra Carbone in [1] and some distinctive property of the system QPK is revealed: QPK has an exponential speed-up over the systems SPK and PK, which, in their turn, have an exponential speed-up over the system PK—. This result drew the heavy interest for the study of the system QPK. In this work for linear proofs steps in the same systems the other relations are received: it is showed that the system QPK has no preference over the system SPK, it is showed also that for the considered formula sets the system PK has no preference over the system PK—, which, in its turn, has no preference over the monotone system PMon. It is proved also, that the same results are reliable for some other sets of formulas and for other systems as well.

Publisher

Institute for Informatics and Automation Problems - NAS RA

Subject

General Medicine

Reference6 articles.

1. A. Carbone, “Quantified propositional logic and the number of lines of tree-like proofs”, Studia Logica, vol.. 64, pp. 315-321, 2000.

2. S. Cook and R. Reckhow, “The relative efficiency of propositional proof systems”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 44, pp. 36-50, 1979.

3. P. Pudlák, The Lengths of Proofs, in S. Buss (ed.), handbook of proof Theory, North Holland, pp. 547-637, 1998.

4. S. C. Kleene , Introduction to Metamathemics. D.VanNostrand Company, INC, 1952.

5. Г. Цейтин и Ан.Чубарян, “Некоторые оценки длин логических выводов в классическом исчислении высказываний”, ДАН Арм. ССР, т. LV, N 1, 10-12, 1972.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3