Regional size differences in four commonly used cephalometric atlases: the Ann Arbor, Cleveland (Bolton), London (UK), and Philadelphia atlases compared-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Regional size differences in four commonly used cephalometric atlases: the Ann Arbor, Cleveland (Bolton), London (UK), and Philadelphia atlases compared

Published:2002-02 Issue:1 Volume:5 Page:51-58
ISSN:1601-6335
Container-title:Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Dibbets JMH,Nolte K

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Oral Surgery,Surgery,Orthodontics

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1034/j.1600-0544.2002.01190.x/fullpdf

Reference22 articles.

1. Dibbets JMH. Applicability of cephalometric standards. An appraisal of atlases Orthodontic Treatment: Outcome and Effectiveness

2. Nolte K. Serielle Streckenmessungen in der Kephalometrie [Thesis] 1997

3. Riolo ML Moyers RE McNamara JA Hunter WS. An Atlas of Craniofacial Growth 1974

4. Broadbent BH Broadbent BH Golden WH. Bolton Standards of Dentofacial Developmental Growth 1975

5. Bhatia SN Leighton BC. A Manual of Facial Growth. A Computer Analysis of Longitudinal Cephalometric Growth Data. 1993

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Twin Block appliance with acrylic capping does not have a significant inhibitory effect on lower incisor proclination;The Angle Orthodontist;2017-01-27

2. Cephalometrics in Stickler syndrome: Objectification of the typical facial appearance;Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery;2016-07

3. Craniofacial morphology of the frontonasal segment in patients with one or two macrodontic maxillary central incisors;The European Journal of Orthodontics;2012-10-04

4. Reference values for three-dimensional surface cephalometry in children aged 3-6 years;Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research;2012-04-20

5. Accounting for measurement error: A critical but often overlooked process;Archives of Oral Biology;2009-12