Dünyada ve Kazakistan'da Sanatın Geliştirilmesi ve Yaratıcı Eğitim: Tasarım ile Karşılaştırmalı Analiz

Author:

KOSHKİNBAYEVA Nurgul1ORCID,ZAİMOĞLU Ömer2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Taraz Regional university

2. AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Abstract

Teachers of art and creative education are assigned more and more complex and effective tasks. However, the current system of art education does not always prepare students for these challenges. When we study what and how our system teaches young designers, we find that the most valuable elements of a designer's perspective and process are rarely taught. Instead, some designers go beyond their education through industry experience, essentially learning by accident. Many project programs still maintain a closed perspective and an inefficient mechanism for tacit knowledge transfer. At the same time, the skills to develop creative solutions to complex problems are becoming increasingly important. Organizations are beginning to realize that signers bring something special to this type of work, a rational belief based on numerous studies that link commercial success to a design-based approach. So, what should we do? Other learned professions, such as medicine, law, and business, provide excellent advice and guidance embedded in their own professionalization history. In this article, we will borrow their experience to recommend a course of action for designing. This will not be easy: it will require a research team to make recommendations on how to compile a list of design and educational practices that schools can use to create a curriculum that is appropriate for their goals and abilities. And then it will take a conscious effort for the design profession to become both a reliable community of practitioners and an effective professor, able together to fully understand the value of design in the 21st century. In this article, we will outline this path.

Publisher

Van Yuzuncu Yil University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference16 articles.

1. Asanova, S. Zh. (2008). Social'no-ekonomicheskie osnovy formirovaniya promyshlennogo kompleksa po proizvodstvu nacional'noj odezhdy. Almaty.

2. Strelnikova, V. E. (2019). Design thinking as a modern design method/Business and Design Review. design method/ Business and Design Review, 4 (16). С. 13.

3. Cavanaugh, J. (2018, March 14). “A Matrix of Competencies for Interaction Design”, Design Higher (online), https://www.designhigher.com/ competencies-for-interaction-design/.

4. Cross, N. (2001). Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49–55.

5. Cross, N. (2019, July). Editing Design Studies—And How to Improve the Likelihood of Your Paper Being Published. Design Studies, 63, A1–A9.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3