Affiliation:
1. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Moscow Power Engineering Institute
Abstract
Unfortunately, in a growing number of publications of the results of the study of turbomachines in ANSYS and other packages, insufficient attention is paid to the choice of the flow model (absolute or relative) and the setting of boundary conditions in the areas adjacent to the rotating impeller: shroud seal, diaphragm (end) seals, gap over shroudless blades, steam balance holes, etc.As a rule, these areas contain such elements of geometry as a “ledge”, “projection”, “crest”, the flow around which, and, consequently, their resistance depends on the angle of incoming flow relative to the barrier. In the stages of turbomachines in sections behind fixed blade units, angle α1 between the flow velocity vector (in absolute motion) and the circumferential velocity is 10°÷25° (for steam turbine stages), 20°÷35° (for gas turbine stages) and 40°÷75° ((for axial compressor stages). It is shown (using the example of viscous flow around the “ledge + projection” system) that a change in the angle in the range of 15°÷90° changes the resistance by almost 2 times.The choice of a particular type of flow model (absolute or relative) for the domain primarily determines the value of the angle of interaction of the flow lines with an obstacle: it remains close to α1, or close to β1 = α1 + 20°÷70°, which significantly changes the qualitative picture of the viscous flow around the characteristic elements of geometry (“ledge”, “projection”, “crest”), and the values of integral parameters (flow rate, power, efficiency). The lack of recommendations on the correct choice of boundary conditions will inevitably lead not only to the inability to compare the results of various published studies, but also to their objective value. Therefore, the need to substantiate proposals for the choice of flow models in the areas of labyrinth seals, steam balance holes, gaps over shroudless blades, etc. is very relevant.
Reference10 articles.
1. Release 18.2 – © SAS IP, Inc. Chapter 11: CFX Best Practices Guide for Turbomachinery. 11.4. Frame Change Models. 11.5. Domain Interface Setup. cadfem-cis.ru
2. Androsovich I. V. Gas turbine engine labyrinth seal modeling and optimization considering the strength properties. //Bulletin of the Moscow Aviation Institute 2022, 29(2): 107–117. DOI: 10.34759/vst2022-2-107-117. Original article.
3. Čížek M., Klír V., Steinbauer P., Vampola T. Labyrinth seal cfd calculation and temperature measurement investigation. AVIATION ISSN: 1648-7788 / eISSN: 1822-4180. 2022. Volume 26 Issue 2: 96–103. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2022.16886.
4. Xinlong Ye and Zhenggui Zhou. Effects of the Shock Wave Structure on the Tip Clearance Leakage Flow in Transonic Compressor Rotors. Hindawi. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering. Volume 2023, Article ID 1477251,1 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1477251
5. Development of a shroudless working blade of the second stage GTE-65.1 turbine. A. V. Granovsky, I. V. Afanasyev, V. K. Kostezh, N. I. Fokin, M. G. Cherkasova © 2023. Teploenergetika, 2023; 7: 51–57.