Affiliation:
1. Belarusian State Medical University
2. Institute of Chemistry of New Materials of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Abstract
Treatment of peritoneal adhesions are still of great importance today. One of the prophylactic measures is biodegradable gels and membranes. The objective of the investigation was to develop and to experimentally assess new materials based on pectin and alginate. Alginate hydrogel was prepared with 4.0, 7.0 and 10.0 weight per cent. The pectin sols were synthesized by the “green chemistry” method. To make flms and porous membranes the solution casting method and the freeze-drying technique were used accordingly. The materials were studied in vitro and in vivo. Their physical properties, biocompatibility, biodegradability, adhesion, the prevention effect, the possibility of using as a matrix for mesenchymal stem cell transplantation were assessed. Alginate hydrogel of 7.0 weight per cent didn’t cause postoperative complications and led to low adhesions incidence – in 10 % of cases (in the comparison group – 85.7 %). Pectin flms obtained by the solution casting method became deformed already in the physiological solution. Biodegradation of the flms was absent in the experiment, abscesses and infltrates in the abdominal cavity were noted. Mesenchymal stem cells didn’t attach to such flms. Porous pectin matrices synthetized by the freeze-drying technique became partially decomposed already in the physiological solution. In the experiment, these membranes were biodegraded in half animals with the formation of mild adhesions only in 25 %. Mesenchymal stem cells showed a good attachment to their surface. The developed materials based on alginate gel and porous pectin membranes showed a high biodegradation, good biocompatibility, adhesion the prevention effect and the possibility of using as a matrix for stem cells transplantation.
Publisher
Publishing House Belorusskaya Nauka
Reference21 articles.
1. Liakakos T., Thomakos N., Fine P. M., Dervenis C., Young R. L. Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical signifcance. Recent advances in prevention and management. Digestive Surgery, 2001, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1159/000050149
2. Barbul A. In brief [Abdominal adhesions]. Current Problems in Surgery, 2015, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 266–269. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpsurg.2015.05.003
3. Brüggmann D., Tchartchian G., Wallwiener M., Münstedt K., Tinneberg H. R., Hackethal A. Intra-abdominal adhesions: defnition, origin, signifcance in surgical practice, and treatment options. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 2010, vol. 107, no. 44, pp. 769–775. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2010.0769
4. Andreev A. A., Ostroushko A. P., Sotnikova E. S., Kir’yanova D. V., Britikov V. N. Peritoneal adhesion disease. Vestnik eksperimental’noi i klinicheskoi khirurgii = Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery, 2017, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 320–326 (in Russian).
5. Kondratovich L. M. Understanding of the peritoneal adhesions formation. Intraoperative prophylaxis with antiadhesion barriers (review of literature). Vestnik novykh meditsinskikh tekhnologii = Journal of New Medical Technologies, 2014, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 169–173 (in Russian).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献