Methodological toolkit sciences of information law

Author:

Perepelitsa E. V.1

Affiliation:

1. National Сenter of Legal Information of the Republic of Belarus

Abstract

The author raises the problem of the relevance of educational means tested by law to the information agenda. The online world has presented legal theory and legal practice with difficult questions. The well-trodden strategies of legal positivism are programmed for a different status state of society than the state of a network-type society. Previous approaches are not always effective regarding communication processes. Information law, more than other legal disciplines, feels the need for creative research tools. Its use is associated with certain risks. However, the formulation and solution of non-trivial cognitive problems requires the reinforcement of traditional methodological strategies with innovative ones. Information-legal, synergetic, phenomenological and other approaches, mastering axiological techniques and convergent techniques are called upon to replenish the heuristic resource of formal dogmatic means. Fidelity to the authority of traditions, together with a readiness to verify unknown research experience, is the way to increase scientific knowledge.

Publisher

Publishing House Belorusskaya Nauka

Reference38 articles.

1. Dadjukova M. N. Prospects for the development of legal science in the future. Science Time, 2022, no. 1 (97), pp. 5–13 (in Russian).

2. Bachilo I. L. Society, state and modern information technologies. Informatsionnye tekhnologii: Innovatsii v gosudarstvennom upravlenii: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Information technology: Innovation in public administration: collection scientific works]. Мoscow, 2010, pp. 8–23 (in Russian).

3. Ivanskiy V. P., Kovalev S. I. The role of rationality philosophy in legal studies (Part II). Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki = RUDN Journal of Law, 2019, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 184–199 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2019-23-2-184-199

4. Zapol’skii S. V., Isakov V. B. New topical grounds for modernisation in the sphere of information technology law. Pravovaya informatika = Legal Informatics, 2023, no. 1, pp. 4–14 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21681/1994-1404-2023-1-4-14

5. Shatkovskaya T. V., Larina O. G. The method of historical criticism in modern legal studies. Filosofiya prava = Philo- sophy of Law, 2019, no. 3 (90), pp. 14–19 (in Russian).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3