Board Certification Status: Considerations for Maintenance of Licensure and the Specialty of Pediatrics

Author:

Radabaugh Carrie L.,Ruch-Ross Holly,Towey Kelly J.,Mulvey Holly J.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The growing emphasis on board certification in medicine in recent years has prompted studies on its impact on medical care. As analyses of the impact of board certification continue, the consequences of board certification status should be examined to evaluate its effect on physician practice characteristics. We studied the effects of board certification on the practice characteristics of general pediatricians, pediatric medical subspecialists, and pediatric surgical specialists and examined the impact of noncertification on Maintenance of Licensure (MOL) and state medical and osteopathic boards. The study utilized the subset of pediatrician respondents to the 2009 Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Survey of Primary Care Physicians. This mail survey was fielded in three rounds in the second half of 2009. The adjusted overall response rate for the survey was 37.6%, but was 49.5% for pediatricians. Data were analyzed using SPSS 18.0. The study found that board certification status is significantly associated with key practice characteristics such as capacity, practice location, and hours worked, and there are differences in the practice characteristics of board certified versus non–board certified general pediatricians, pediatric medical subspecialists, and pediatric surgical specialists. Consequently, advocating for increased levels of board certification may have unanticipated implications for patient access to care. As the majority of pediatricians are board certified, workforce planners should consider and acknowledge these differences when engaging in planning initiatives, particularly in the context of Maintenance of Certification (MOC), MOL, and the expansion of access to care under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Publisher

Federation of State Medical Boards

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3