How – and How Much? An Analysis of Major Conflict Lines Regarding the Transformation of German Animal Farming

Author:

Von Gall Philipp,Luy Jörg,Köder MoritzORCID,Von Meyer-Höfer Marie

Abstract

Based on the concept of a 'future workshop', this paper contributes to the understanding of major conflict lines and future pathways for animal farming in Germany. Participants in the future workshop were tasked with outlining their ideal vision of the future of animal farming, focusing on both its mode and quantity. We found three different types of visions differing in their motivation, farming methods, and the scale of envisioned animal farming: ‘Higher Standards’ (V1), ‘System Change and Reduction’ (V2), ‘Alternatives to Animal Farming’ (V3). V1 seeks to secure the quantities of supply and demand of animal products in Germany with minor adjustments towards improved animal welfare and investments in resource-efficiency and climate friendliness. V2 advocates for comprehensive social and environmental systemic changes throughout the agri-food sector, with substantially fewer animals involved. V3 aims to replace animal farming, with plant-based and other alternatives, whenever and wherever possible. Our findings suggest that there is little ground for a societal consensus on a single future mode and scale of animal farming. Stakeholder dialogues and policy initiatives should therefore allow for different pathways while focusing on compromises in the near future. Short-term solutions may be acceptable to supporters of all three visions, however, achieving this requires reframing the debate from ‘securing the future of animal farming’ to ‘guiding the future of animal farming’, acknowledging the potential – albeit partly – replacement of animal farming by suitable alternatives.

Publisher

TIB Open Publishing

Reference25 articles.

1. Busch, G., Spiller, A. (2018): Consumer acceptance of livestock farming around the globe. Animal frontiers: the review magazine of animal agriculture 8 (1): 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfx005.

2. DAFA (Deutsche Agrarforschungsallianz) (2022): Zielbilder für die Landwirtschaft 2049. Synthese des Zielbildprozesses der Deutschen Agrarforschungsallianz. https://www.dafa.de/wp-content/uploads/DAFA-Synthesebericht-Zielbildprozess.pdf, accessed: 23.2.2024.

3. Deonna, J., Teroni, F. (2012): The Emotions. A Philosophical Introduction. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203721742.

4. Deutscher Ethikrat (2020): Tierwohlachtung – Zum verantwortlichen Umgang mit Nutztieren. Stellungnahme. Berlin.

5. European Commission (2007): Special Eurobarometer 270. Attitudes of EU Citizens towards Animal Welfare. Report. Brussels.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3