Abstract
Based on the concept of a 'future workshop', this paper contributes to the understanding of major conflict lines and future pathways for animal farming in Germany. Participants in the future workshop were tasked with outlining their ideal vision of the future of animal farming, focusing on both its mode and quantity. We found three different types of visions differing in their motivation, farming methods, and the scale of envisioned animal farming: ‘Higher Standards’ (V1), ‘System Change and Reduction’ (V2), ‘Alternatives to Animal Farming’ (V3). V1 seeks to secure the quantities of supply and demand of animal products in Germany with minor adjustments towards improved animal welfare and investments in resource-efficiency and climate friendliness. V2 advocates for comprehensive social and environmental systemic changes throughout the agri-food sector, with substantially fewer animals involved. V3 aims to replace animal farming, with plant-based and other alternatives, whenever and wherever possible. Our findings suggest that there is little ground for a societal consensus on a single future mode and scale of animal farming. Stakeholder dialogues and policy initiatives should therefore allow for different pathways while focusing on compromises in the near future. Short-term solutions may be acceptable to supporters of all three visions, however, achieving this requires reframing the debate from ‘securing the future of animal farming’ to ‘guiding the future of animal farming’, acknowledging the potential – albeit partly – replacement of animal farming by suitable alternatives.
Reference25 articles.
1. Busch, G., Spiller, A. (2018): Consumer acceptance of livestock farming around the globe. Animal frontiers: the review magazine of animal agriculture 8 (1): 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfx005.
2. DAFA (Deutsche Agrarforschungsallianz) (2022): Zielbilder für die Landwirtschaft 2049. Synthese des Zielbildprozesses der Deutschen Agrarforschungsallianz. https://www.dafa.de/wp-content/uploads/DAFA-Synthesebericht-Zielbildprozess.pdf, accessed: 23.2.2024.
3. Deonna, J., Teroni, F. (2012): The Emotions. A Philosophical Introduction. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203721742.
4. Deutscher Ethikrat (2020): Tierwohlachtung – Zum verantwortlichen Umgang mit Nutztieren. Stellungnahme. Berlin.
5. European Commission (2007): Special Eurobarometer 270. Attitudes of EU Citizens towards Animal Welfare. Report. Brussels.