SCAPV Creates the Possibility of Less Irrigation and Higher Productivity
-
Published:2024-05-23
Issue:
Volume:2
Page:
-
ISSN:2751-6172
-
Container-title:AgriVoltaics Conference Proceedings
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:AgriVoltaics Conf Proc
Author:
Ali Abaker Omer AltyebORCID, Liu Wen, Li Ming, Chen Fangcai, Liu Wenjun, Ingenhoff JanORCID, Fan Liulu, Zhang Fangxin, Zhang Xinyu, Zheng Jianan, Zhang Zhisen
Abstract
In agrivoltaic (APV), photovoltaic (PV) panels are positioned above farmland to produce energy and food simultaneously. However, PV panels above farmland block most sunlight from reaching plants for photosynthesis. Plants require sunlight for photosynthesis. We proposed Spectrum-splitting and Concentrated APV (SCAPV) to address contradictions between photosynthesis and energy production simultaneously. This study examines the effect of SCAPV on the evapotranspiration and growth of peanuts and soybeans. Peanuts and soybeans were planted under SCAPV and open-air (CK) treatments, and a weather station was placed in each treatment. Results showed that evapotranspiration under SCAPV significantly decreased by 31% compared to CK. Thus, it improved physiological characterization, enhanced quality, and increased the yield of peanuts and soybeans. Peanuts' protein, fat, and linoleic acid increased by 5.54%, 0.28%, and 1.14% under SCAPV compared to CK. Fat, soluble sugar, linoleic acid, and alpha-linolenic acid of soybean were increased by 6.75%, 15.24%, 13.72%, and 15.14%, respectively, under SCAPV compared to CK. The average land equivalent ratio of SCAPV is 1.7. We trust that SCAPV could provide food and energy while reducing irritation on the same farmland.
Funder
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Publisher
TIB Open Publishing
Reference26 articles.
1. C. D. Pérez-Blanco, A. Hrast-Essenfelder, and C. Perry, “Irrigation technology and water conservation: A review of the theory and evidence,” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/reaa004. 2. R. Q. Grafton, J. Williams, and Q. Jiang, “Possible pathways and tensions in the food and water nexus,” Earth’s Future, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 449–462, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000506. 3. R. Q. Grafton et al., “The paradox of irrigation efficiency,” Science, vol. 361, no. 6404, pp. 748–750, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat9314. 4. M. A. Pervaiz, M. Iqbal, K. Shahzad, and A. U. Hassan, “Effect of mulch on soil physical properties and N, P, K concentration in maize (Zea mays L.) shoots under two tillage systems,” International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 119–124, 2009. 5. F. Khorsandi, “Soil water conservation by course textured volcanic rock mulch,” Asian J. Exp. Biol. Sci, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 762–765, 2011.
|
|